Pass4sure VCS-273 Q&A are best to Pass exam | | Inicio RADIONAVES

Pass your VCS-273 exams 4 sure with verified and authentic Pass4sure practice test - Pass4sure Questions Answers and Pass4sure Exam Simulator We offer each every exam required to pass VCS-273 exams - - Inicio RADIONAVES

Pass4sure VCS-273 dumps | Killexams.com VCS-273 existent questions | http://www.radionaves.com/

VCS-273 Administration of Veritas NetBackup 7.6.1 and NetBackup Appliances 2.6.1

Study lead Prepared by Killexams.com Veritas Dumps Experts


Killexams.com VCS-273 Dumps and existent Questions

100% existent Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



VCS-273 exam Dumps Source : Administration of Veritas NetBackup 7.6.1 and NetBackup Appliances 2.6.1

Test Code : VCS-273
Test name : Administration of Veritas NetBackup 7.6.1 and NetBackup Appliances 2.6.1
Vendor name : Veritas
: 123 existent Questions

Do you need Latest dumps of VCS-273 exam, It is birthright place?
i used to be about to surrender exam VCS-273 due to the fact I wasnt confident in whether or not i might pass or not. With just a week remaining I decided to exchange to killexams.com for my exam instruction. in no way concept that the subjects that I had continually elope far from could be a lot a laugh to study; its smooth and short way of getting to the factors made my practise lot simpler. whole way to killexams.com , I never concept i would pass my exam but I did pass with flying colorations.


Got no problem! 3 days preparation of VCS-273 Latest dumps is required.
Im very cheerful with this bundle as I Have been given over 96% in this VCS-273 exam. I test the professional VCS-273 manual a bit, but I guess killexams.com modified into my number one training useful resource. I memorized most of the questions and answers, and moreover invested the time to in fact understand the eventualities and tech/practice centeredparts of the exam. I assume that by way of manner of itself purchasing the killexams.com package deal does not assure that you maypass your exam - and a few test are virtually difficult. However, in case you Have a study their materials difficult and actually positioned your thoughts and your coronary heart into your exam steerage, then killexams.com sincerely beats some otherexam prep alternatives to be had obtainable.


surprised to peer VCS-273 actual test questions!
I got a excellent give up result with this bundle. Extremely submissive fine, questions are rectify and that i got most of them on the exam. After i Have handed it, I recommended killexams.com to my colleagues, and actually each person passed their exams, too (a number of them took Cisco test, others did Microsoft, VMware, and lots of others). I Have no longer heard a lousy test of killexams.com, so this need to be the remarkable IT schooling you may presently discover online.


Can you believe, whole VCS-273 questions I prepared were asked.
I Have by no means used this sort of excellent Dumps for my getting to know. It assisted well for the VCS-273 exam. I already used the killexams.com killexams.com and passed my VCS-273 exam. It is the elastic material to apply. However, i was a underneath dispassionate candidate, it made me pass within the exam too. I used simplest killexams.com for the studying and never used some different material. I will hold on using your product for my destiny tests too. Have been given 98%.


actual VCS-273 questions and intelligence dumps! It warrant the fee.
Whilst my VCS-273 exam changed into birthright beforehand of me, I had no time left and i was freaking out. I used to be cursing myself for losing plenty time in foster on vain material however I needed to finish some thing and consequently I need to best reflect onconsideration on one factor that might preserve me. Google suggested that, the thing became killexams.com. I knew that it had the entirety that a candidate would possibly require for VCS-273 exam of Veritas and that helped me in accomplishing birthright markss within the VCS-273 exam.


I want actual examination questions today's VCS-273 examination.
I dont sense alone whole through tests anymore because of the fact i Have a top class Have a examine companion in the shape of this killexams. Not handiest that however I moreover Have teachers who are organized to lead me at any time of the day. This identical guidance was given to me at some stage in my exams and it didnt matter whether it changed into day or night time, whole my questions Have been spoke back. I am very thankful to the lecturers birthright here for being so greatand pleasant and assisting me in clearing my very tough exam with VCS-273 Have a keep material and VCS-273 test and sureeven VCS-273 exam simulator is awesome.


VCS-273 exam is not any extra arduous to pass with these .
currently i bought your certification package and studied it very well. closing week I passed the VCS-273 and acquired my certification. killexams.com online exam simulator became a exceptional tool to sequel together the exam. that greater my confidence and i easily handed the certification exam! pretty advocated!!! As I had only one week left for exam VCS-273, I frantically searched for some unique contents and stopped at killexams.com . It become shaped with short question-solutions that had been facile to recognize. within one week, I analyze as many questions as viable. inside the exam, it become clean for me to control eighty three% making 50/60 accurate answers in due time. killexams.com changed into an awesome reply for me. thank you.


Shortest questions that works in existent test environment.
I am grateful to killexams.com for their mock test on VCS-273. I could pass the exam with no trouble. Thanks again. I even Have additionally taken mock test from you for my different checks. I am finding it very advantageous and am assured of clearing this exam through reaching extra than eighty five%. Your questions bank may be very advantageous and explainations moreover are superb. I will Come up with a 4 megastar score.


Nice to hear that dumps of VCS-273 exam are available.
Being a network expert, I notion appearing for VCS-273 exam might honestly assist me in my profession. but, due to time restrains education for the exam Have become truly difficult for me. i was seeking out a study manual that could gain things higher for me. killexams.com dumps labored enjoy wonders for me as that is a scientific solution for greater special study. whole of sudden, with its assist, I controlled to finish the exam in only 70 minutes thats certainly a shocking. thanks to killexams.com material.


Get those VCS-273 existent exam questions and solutions! finish now not pick up rippoff
I though that if I may want to transparent their VCS-273 test and sure that is once I got here to know with my passe fine buddy that killexams.com is the one that could be the boon for me as it were given me my intelligence eventually again which I had misplaced for a while and that i wish that this will in no way recover from for me getting my VCS-273 test cleared after all.


Veritas Administration of Veritas NetBackup

Veritas Solidifies AWS companion community status, Attains AWS Storage Competency for Veritas NetBackup, Veritas Backup Exec | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

long-term Retention solutions allow organizations to again Up statistics to the Cloud

SANTA CLARA, California, Feb. 6, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Veritas technologies, a worldwide leader in enterprise records insurance plot and software-defined storage, announced that its flagship products, Veritas NetBackup and Veritas Backup Exec, Have attained Amazon net features (AWS) Storage Competency reputation, reaffirming Veritas as an AWS associate network (APN) advanced know-how companion providing options validated by using the AWS Storage Competency.

Veritas NetBackup and Backup Exec now lead multiple AWS storage courses, together with Amazon elementary Storage carrier (Amazon S3), Amazon S3 standard-infrequent entry (Amazon S3 typical-IA), and Amazon Glacier.

For companies of practically whole sizes using the cloud or because a mosey to the cloud, Veritas' industry-leading backup and recovery solutions can gain information administration and insurance policy to, from, and within AWS much less difficult. This additionally extends Veritas' commitment to speed up cloud adoption for companies globally.

"trendy announcement expands on the relationship between AWS and Veritas as well as Veritas' goal to give agencies with potent cloud solutions to manage and at ease data throughout the cloud and on-premises environments," pointed out David Noy, vp and accepted supervisor, Product management and Alliances, Veritas. "reaching AWS Storage Competency popularity helps us achieve their purpose of assisting agencies sequel in oblige long-time period information retention innovations with one of the premiere statistics coverage experiences within the cloud."

Veritas done APN advanced technology companion fame in 2017 to enhance solutions that lead shoppers in accelerating their cloud and facts administration initiatives. Ever considering, agencies were able to leverage Veritas solutions and AWS infrastructure to aid them speed up migration to the cloud whereas enhancing the management of purposes and records across hybrid cloud environments.

Now, with the integration of Veritas NetBackup and Backup Exec options, purchasers can give protection to information and ward towards loss from physical or ratiocinative blunders, such as gadget failure, application error, or fortuitous deletion when backing up, to or from AWS.

"we're relocating to a completely cloud-based AWS environment to dwindle prices and in the reduction of the cadaver of workers time required to assist information and functions," celebrated Aurélien Durand, storage and backup engineer for global optimized aid administration chief Veolia. "using Veritas NetBackup with Amazon S3 allows for us to try this whereas protecting whole of their most vital records. dropping accounting or economic facts would Have a massive repercussion on their business."

Modernize long-time period retention with Veritas' integration solutionFurther advancing Veritas' commitment to the cloud, Veritas has developed integrated options for long-term retention (LTR) accessible in the AWS reply area. These options enable corporations to modernize lengthy-term records retention options, give protection to enterprise application information and validate industry uptime. They consist of:

  • up to date statistics core backup with Veritas and AWS – Veritas NetBackup and Cloud catalyst solutions are designed to support companies withhold copies of their backup information to AWS extra without problems, whereas conserving statistics optimization. This helps corporations tackle expenses associated with storing colossal quantities of statistics in a cloud repository and might aid boost statistics transfer efficiency.
  • AWS for LTR – Veritas NetBackup utility and gear solutions leverage AWS to gain it a much option for storing backup information to the cloud, mainly for LTR.
  • AWS is enabling scalable, bendy, and inexpensive solutions from startups to international agencies. To lead the seamless integration and deployment of those options, AWS subject the AWS Competency application to serve consumers establish Consulting and know-how APN partners with profound industry undergo and advantage.

    Veritas NetBackup and Veritas Backup Exec are at present accessible on AWS industry. To be taught extra or pick up first-hand adventure with moving and protecting facts on AWS, talk over with Veritas' microsite for AWS and win a Veritas NetBackup examine pressure birthright here.

    About VeritasVeritas technologies is a worldwide chief in industry facts management – their utility and options assist groups protect their mission-vital information. Tens of thousands of businesses, together with ninety five% of Fortune a hundred companies, depend on us each day to back up and pick up better their statistics, retain it restful and accessible, to safeguard against failure and obtain regulatory compliance. In brand recent digital economic system, Veritas supplies expertise that helps corporations in the reduction of hazards and capitalize on their most valuable digital asset – their records. gain knowledge of more at www.veritas.com or keep us on Twitter at @veritastechllc.

    forward-searching Statements: Any forward-searching indication of plans for products is preparatory and whole future liberate dates are tentative and are belt to alternate on the sole discretion of Veritas. Any future release of the product or planned modifications to product potential, performance, or function are bailiwick to ongoing evaluation by way of Veritas, may moreover or may moreover now not be applied, should no longer be considered solid commitments by Veritas, may still not be relied upon in making purchasing selections, and may no longer be included into any contract.

    Veritas and the Veritas emblem are trademarks or registered logos of Veritas applied sciences LLC or its affiliates within the U.S. and other international locations. other names may well be emblems of their respective house owners.

    PR Contacts

    US ContactText 100Sami Asiri 415-593-8447Veritas@text100.com 

    EMEA ContactVeritas TechnologiesJames Blameyjames.blamey@veritas.com

    APJ ContactVeritas TechnologiesBan Leng Neo +65 98295801banleng.neo@veritas.com

    brand - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/466009/Veritas_Logo.jpg

    connected links

    http://veritas.com

    supply Veritas applied sciences


    Veritas NetBackup certifies its backup and restoration solution for shielding Docker containers | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    supply Veritas applied sciences

    With the Docker certification, NetBackup rounds up its wide coverage of modern recent workloads enjoy Hadoop or MongoDB

    SANTA CLARA, Calif., Jan. sixteen, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Veritas applied sciences, the international leader in enterprise data insurance policy and the software-described storage market, these days announced that NetBackup 8.1.2 has received certification for shielding Docker container primarily based workloads. Veritas' purchasers might be able to give protection to their containerized data and other legacy or contemporaneous workloads enjoy SAP Hana, Hadoop or MongoDB in multi cloud, virtual and physical environments.

    Containerization of modern workloads are becoming the norm for groups throughout the realm as an efficient option to boost and deploy applications. Gartner expects that "by using 2020, greater than 50% of world businesses could be running containerized applications in creation, up under 20% these days."1 This swiftly deployment is leading to questions on facts integrity as an expanding variety of recent containerized purposes are designed to create and modify persistent information. This evolution is emphasizing the want for develope backup and recovery techniques that offer protection to containerized information and functions at any location they reside.

    "With certification for the Docker commercial enterprise container platform, Veritas as soon as again proves its capabilities to widely and at once cowl recent contemporaneous workloads," says Glen Simon, Product & options marketing at Veritas. "customers can offer protection to their captious records across on premise deployments and in inner most and public cloud environments and they're going to edge from Veritas' future system to whole of a sudden assist any upcoming recent workload sooner or later."

    flexible Backup and restore for Containers

    In container-based mostly application architectures, some containers are designed to create or adjust persistent information. during this case, the insurance policy of the information would be essential however moreover allows for different scenarios the location data can be safely excluded from backup procedures.

    As a Docker certified Container for backup and healing, Veritas presents three different ways to give protection to containers with NetBackup, to enable optimum flexibility. Veritas has developed a containerized NetBackup client that can moreover be deployed as a container and utilized to protect persistent utility facts in this dynamic ambiance. Certification to the Docker commercial enterprise platform ensures a facile deployment for the consumer with cooperative support from each Docker and Veritas for production environments.

    Veritas shoppers can additionally give protection to their physical environments in addition to their contemporaneous digital and multi-cloud deployments with industry scale performance because the newest NetBackup eight.1.2 supports Docker and different subsequent-era workloads enjoy Hadoop, Nutanix, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, HBase and MongoDB.

    The backup and restoration operations in these heterogeneous advanced architectures are being managed through a radically simplified and intuitive person interface that allows for approved employees to without hardship protect and parade screen their own information and applications, anyplace they reside.

    clients using NetBackup version eight.1 or later can automatically down load and consume the certified NetBackup client for Docker industry to offer protection to their containerized software information. it is downloadable from Veritas.com or from the Docker Hub here. To be trained more about this recent NetBackup capacity, shoppers can moreover read this white paper.

    About VeritasVeritas applied sciences is the world leader within the enterprise records coverage and application-defined storage market. We aid the most vital businesses on the planet, together with 86 percent of the global Fortune 500, returned up and ameliorate their records, withhold it comfy and purchasable, protect towards failure and achieve regulatory compliance. As organizations modernize their IT infrastructure, Veritas supplies the expertise that helps them reduce risks and capitalize on their facts. be trained extra at www.veritas.com or comply with us on Twitter at @veritastechllc.

    forward-searching Statements: Any ahead-searching indication of plans for items is preparatory and whole future unlock dates are tentative and are belt to trade at the sole discretion of Veritas. Any future unencumber of the product or deliberate changes to product ability, performance, or characteristic are belt to ongoing contrast by way of Veritas, may additionally or may no longer be applied, may still now not be regarded company commitments by Veritas, may still no longer be relied upon in making deciding to buy decisions, and may no longer be included into any contract.

    Veritas, the Veritas logo, NetBackup and BackupExec are emblems or registered emblems of Veritas technologies LLC or its affiliates within the U.S. and different nations. other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

    PR Contacts

    US ContactText 100Sami Asiri 415-593-8447Veritas@text100.com 

    EMEA ContactVeritas TechnologiesJames Blamey +44 7467 688263James.blamey@veritas.com

    APJ ContactVeritas TechnologiesBan Leng Neo +sixty five 9771 3894BanLeng.neo@veritas.com

    1 supply: Gartner, Inc., most excellent Practices for working Containers in construction, Arun Chandrasekaran, Dennis Smith, 25 July 2017. 

    Cision View long-established content material to down load multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/veritas-netbackup-certifies-its-backup-and-recovery-solution-for-protecting-docker-containers-300778905.html

    ©2017 PR Newswire. whole Rights Reserved.

    assistance contained on this page is equipped by way of an impartial third-birthday celebration content provider. Frankly and this web page gain no warranties or representations in connection therewith. if you're affiliated with this page and would affection it removed tickle contact pressreleases@franklyinc.com


    Veritas NetBackup ameliorate comprises facelift | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Veritas NetBackup shoppers will remark some changes soon. Veritas these days launched NetBackup eight.1.2, giving its flagship records coverage application a massive interface facelift.

    Killian Evers, vice president of client and consumer event at Veritas, joined the industry eight months ago and has been working on a NetBackup ameliorate ever considering the fact that. She referred to her design team concentrated on making NetBackup's recent design standard, intuitive and integrated. The thought is to gain it more visually attractive however moreover more convenient to use.

    "now they Have performed lots of design adjustments that simplify the usual adventure -- visually and interactively," she spoke of. "We created guided experiences. They provide you with assistance and recommendations in order that you are not looking and pecking."

    Examples of interface improvements within the NetBackup upgrade comprehend the consume of calendars to set facts restoration points and a modernized, cellular-friendly navigation menu.

    The NetBackup upgrade is a response to a turning out to be style in which IT administrator roles Have become extra generalized instead of really expert. That means IT cadaver of workers using NetBackup 8.1.2 can be utility homeowners or virtualization directors in preference to the backup directors who had been using the leading backup utility app for years or even many years.

    "here's a style we're seeing in this house, the location admins are being requested to finish extra with much less, and different individuals are being requested to finish some tasks that your traditional [backup] admin would've completed," Evers talked about. Simplifying the consumer undergo is meant to support these IT "versatilists," whose disciplines and obligations are not narrowed to just backup.

    Veritas NetBackup 8.1.2 screenshot NetBackup 8.1.2 has a recent dashboard as Part of a visible overhaul. Integrations covered with interface upgrade

    besides the fact that children a colossal component, the interface design advancements don't appear to be the simplest enhancements in NetBackup 8.1.2. The NetBackup upgrade unifies cloud, virtual and actual workloads onto a single console and features stronger integration with VMware. There are additionally recent automation alternatives and integration with Veritas CloudPoint 2.1, the supplier's multi-cloud facts coverage app.

    we've got carried out lots of design adjustments that simplify the overall event -- visually and interactively. Killian Eversvice president of client and person adventure, Veritas

    Edwin Yuen, senior analyst at commercial enterprise strategy community, celebrated the NetBackup design adjustments are huge in present day IT world where iPhone clients of the day prior to this are the IT versatilists of today.

    "The captious component it really is occurring here is there's been a era where the end-person interface is the provider," Yuen mentioned. "They definitely don't keeping in regards to the lower back end."

    on account of this style, it be no longer remarkable to Yuen that Veritas became so focused on catering its interface to this becoming viewers. "The productivity of a user and the satisfaction of the conclusion person for many services these days is definitely predicated on how they Have interaction with it," he observed. "They remark the app as the manifestation of the carrier."

    Evers talked about consumer comments and collaboration drove development of the NetBackup upgrade. "It in fact became according to their consumers, which is why we've been working with them so hand in hand whole through this total event," she talked about. "We validated the heck out of this factor."

    Evers' team will show to redecorate greater Veritas purposes now that it's complete with the flagship product. before becoming a member of Veritas in January 2018, Evers spent eight years engaged on product design at Oracle. She spoke of she helped spruce up items akin to Oracle revenue online, Oracle Fusion and Oracle HCM Cloud earlier than moving to Veritas.

    "My group is asking on the entire lifecycle adventure at Veritas," she mentioned. "I crave americans to need to consume their utility, and never to Have to consume their utility."

    Veritas NetBackup 8.1.2 will be commonly accessible in mid-to-late September. existing clients finish not need to finish the comfort to acquire the upgrade.


    While it is arduous errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals pick up sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater Part of other's sham report objection customers Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never condense on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certitude is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you remark any incorrect report posted by their rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something enjoy this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of submissive administrations because of their advantages. There are a much many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their case questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu


    000-086 rehearse test | 101 mock exam | HP0-698 free pdf | VCS-352 braindumps | 98-368 dumps questions | 000-276 braindumps | LOT-802 brain dumps | PEGACSA bootcamp | 000-874 rehearse test | P2090-054 dump | 351-001 cram | HP2-Z03 free pdf | 000-609 study guide | VCS-272 sample test | BCP-620 test questions | HP0-J53 existent questions | HP0-S33 exam prep | 050-691 rehearse questions | 000-724 questions answers | LOT-985 exam questions |


    Pass4sure VCS-273 existent question bank
    We Have Tested and Approved VCS-273 Exams study guides and brain dumps. killexams.com gives the exact and most recent existent questions with braindumps which practically contain whole information that you need to pass the VCS-273 exam. With the lead of their VCS-273 exam materials, you dont Have to squander your chance on perusing reference books but simply need to scorch through 10-20 hours to memorize their VCS-273 existent questions and answers.

    If you are inquisitive about passing the Veritas VCS-273 exam to open earning? killexams.com has forefront developed Administration of Veritas NetBackup 7.6.1 and NetBackup Appliances 2.6.1 test questions that will gain sure you pass this VCS-273 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated VCS-273 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that offer VCS-273 brain dumps however those are not rectify and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com VCS-273 recent questions will be a best thing to pass VCS-273 exam in straight forward means. We are whole cognizant that a significant drawback within the IT industry is there's an absence of quality study dumps. Their test preparation dumps provides you everything you will Have to be compelled to win a certification test. Their Veritas VCS-273 exam offers you with test questions with verified answers that replicate the actual test. These Questions and Answers offer you with the expertise of taking the particular exam. prime quality and worth for the VCS-273 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your Veritas VCS-273 exam and acquire your Veritas certification. They Have a tendency at killexams.com are committed to assist you pass your VCS-273 exam with high scores. The probabilities of you failing your VCS-273 exam, once memorizing their comprehensive brain dumps are little. Veritas VCS-273 is rare whole round the globe, and moreover the industry and programming arrangements gave by them are being grasped by each one of the organizations. They need serve in driving an outsized gain of organizations on the far side any doubt. So much reaching learning of VCS-273 eam are viewed as a vital capability, and moreover the specialists certified by them are exceptionally prestigious altogether associations.

    killexams.com helps a huge gain of candidates pass the tests and pick up their certification. They Have a colossal wide variety of fruitful reviews. Their dumps are solid, slight, updated and of truly satisfactory much to overcome the demanding situations of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are most recent updated in notably clobber manner on current premise and material is discharged every now and then. Most recent killexams.com dumps are accessible in testing focuses with whom we're retaining up their relationship to pick up most recent material.

    killexams.com Veritas Certification study guides are setup through IT specialists. Most people complaint that there are an unreasonable gain of questions in this sort of sizable wide variety of schooling assessments and exam resource, and they may be recently wiped out to manage the cost of any extra. Seeing killexams.com experts exercise session this far accomplishing rendition at the very time as still assurance that each one the getting to know is secured after profound studies and exam. Everything is to gain consolation for hopefuls on their road to affirmation.

    We Have Tested and Approved VCS-273 Exams. killexams.com offers the most specific and most recent IT exam materials which almost incorporate whole exam topics. With the lead of their VCS-273 study materials, you dont need to squander your risk on perusing major Part of reference books and honestly want to scorch through 10-20 hours to ace their VCS-273 existent questions and answers. Whats greater, they provide you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its presented to present the candidates reenact the Veritas VCS-273 exam in a actual surroundings.

    We give free updates. Inside legitimacy duration, if VCS-273 exam materials which you Have received up to date, they will let you know with the aid of email to down load maximum latest variation of . On the off hazard that you dont pass your Veritas Administration of Veritas NetBackup 7.6.1 and NetBackup Appliances 2.6.1 exam, They will give you full refund. You should ship the scanned reproduction of your VCS-273 exam document card to us. Subsequent to asserting, they will unexpectedly provide you with full REFUND.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for whole tests on internet site
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $ninety nine
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for whole Orders


    In the event which you pick up ready for the Veritas VCS-273 exam utilising their exam simulator engine. It is something however difficult to succeed for whole certifications inside the number one undertaking. You dont want to exploit whole dumps or any lax torrent / rapidshare whole stuff. They offer free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can keep the interface, question much and ease of consume of their schooling exams earlier than you select to buy.

    VCS-273 | VCS-273 | VCS-273 | VCS-273 | VCS-273 | VCS-273


    Killexams JK0-802 cheat sheets | Killexams C2140-839 rehearse exam | Killexams C90-06A pdf download | Killexams HP0-S30 braindumps | Killexams 000-433 rehearse test | Killexams ISEB-ITILV3F brain dumps | Killexams HPE6-A43 test questions | Killexams HP0-286 rehearse questions | Killexams 000-M17 questions answers | Killexams H13-621 exam prep | Killexams 1Z0-475 mock exam | Killexams HP0-742 braindumps | Killexams 000-N21 questions and answers | Killexams 050-639 dumps questions | Killexams HP0-782 rehearse Test | Killexams ARDMS exam prep | Killexams 350-021 dumps | Killexams 9L0-008 examcollection | Killexams 70-552-VB rehearse questions | Killexams HP2-B35 free pdf download |


    Exam Simulator : Pass4sure VCS-273 Exam Simulator

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams 000-253 study guide | Killexams 000-M05 questions answers | Killexams NS0-310 study guide | Killexams M2090-744 free pdf download | Killexams C2090-621 examcollection | Killexams A2090-422 free pdf | Killexams 70-553-VB exam prep | Killexams HP2-H18 exam questions | Killexams EVP-100 sample test | Killexams 00M-230 braindumps | Killexams HP0-J17 pdf download | Killexams C9560-505 brain dumps | Killexams 020-222 study guide | Killexams TB0-122 bootcamp | Killexams 2B0-012 braindumps | Killexams LOT-920 rehearse test | Killexams 000-567 test prep | Killexams HP0-Y22 VCE | Killexams ES0-002 braindumps | Killexams 920-177 braindumps |


    Administration of Veritas NetBackup 7.6.1 and NetBackup Appliances 2.6.1

    Pass 4 sure VCS-273 dumps | Killexams.com VCS-273 existent questions | http://www.radionaves.com/

    Symantec Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2015 Results | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Symantec Corp. (NASDAQ: SYMC) today reported the results of its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2015, ended April 3, 2015.

    Michael A. Brown, president and CEO, said, “Fiscal 2015 was a transformative year for Symantec, as they announced their unified security and information management strategies, delivered more than fifty products, and made the decision to separate Symantec and Veritas into two standalone companies.”

    “With the progress they made in FY15, their businesses Have the necessary focus to thrive and they are already seeing the benefits. Setting aside currency headwinds, continued growth in both implied billings and deferred revenue underscores the momentum in their businesses. Their endpoint protection, data loss prevention, NetBackup appliances and NetBackup software whole outperformed the market this quarter.”

    Thomas Seifert, executive vice president and CFO, said, “Symantec returned to growth and expanded operating margin year-over-year in constant currency during the fourth quarter. They continued to ameliorate their cost structure, and over the year delivered more than $150 million of incremental profit from their revenue and efficiency initiatives. Additionally, the Veritas separation is progressing on schedule.”

    Results for the Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2015 (Dollars in millions, except EPS)

                                    4Q15       4Q14      

    ReportedY/YChange

         

    FXAdjustedY/Y Change

    GAAP                                 Revenue       $1,518       $1,625       (7%)       0% Operating Margin       10.0%       18.8%       (880) bps       (640) bps Net Income       $176       $217       (19%)       N/A Deferred Revenue       $3,664       $3,903       (6%)       1% EPS (Diluted)       $0.25       $0.31       (19%)       N/A CFFO       $488       $449       9%       N/A Non-GAAP                                 Revenue       $1,548       $1,650       (6%)       1% Operating Margin       25.6%       27.2%       (160) bps       30 bps Net Income       $299       $333       (10%)       N/A EPS (Diluted)       $0.43       $0.48       (10%)       N/A  

    Results for Fiscal Year 2015 (Dollars in millions, except EPS)

                                    FY15       FY14      

    ReportedY/YChange

         

    FXAdjustedY/Y Change

    GAAP                                 Revenue       $6,508       $6,676       (3%)       0% Operating Margin       17.7%       17.7%       0 bps       60 bps Net Income       $878       $898       (2%)       N/A Deferred Revenue       $3,664       $3,903       (6%)       1% EPS (Diluted)       $1.26       $1.28       (2%)       N/A CFFO       $1,312       $1,281       2%       N/A Non-GAAP                                 Revenue       $6,538       $6,701       (2%)       0% Operating Margin       27.3%       27.4%       (10) bps       50 bps Net Income       $1,311       $1,370       (4%)       N/A EPS (Diluted)       $1.88       $1.95       (4%)       N/A  

    First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Guidance (Dollars in millions, except EPS and FX rate)

                        1Q16       FY16 GAAP                 Revenue       $1,500 - $1,540       $6,210 - $6,350 Operating Margin       14.0% - 15.0%       14.5% - 15.5% EPS (Diluted)       $0.20 - $0.23       $0.86 - $0.96 Non-GAAP                 Operating Margin       27.0% - 28.0%       29.0% - 30.0% EPS (Diluted)       $0.41 - $0.44       $1.80 - $1.90 Tax Rate       27.0%       27.5% Share Count       690 million       694 million FX Rate (€/$)       $1.10       $1.13  

    Symantec's Board of Directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per common share to be paid on June 24, 2015 to whole shareholders of record as of the immediate of industry on June 10, 2015. The ex-dividend date will be June 8, 2015.

    Conference Call

    Symantec has scheduled a conference call for 5 p.m. ET/2 p.m. PT today to contend its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2015 results, ended April 3, 2015 and to review guidance. Interested parties may access the conference call on the Internet at http://www.symantec.com/invest. To listen to the live call, tickle mosey to the website at least 15 minutes early to register, download and install any necessary audio software. A replay and their prepared remarks will be available on the investor relations home page shortly after the call is completed.

    About Symantec

    Symantec Corporation (NASDAQ: SYMC) is an information protection expert that helps people, businesses and governments seeking the liberty to unlock the opportunities technology brings -- anytime, anywhere. Founded in April 1982, Symantec, a Fortune 500 company, operating one of the largest global data-intelligence networks, has provided leading security, backup and availability solutions for where vital information is stored, accessed and shared. The company's more than 19,000 employees reside in more than 50 countries. Ninety-nine percent of Fortune 500 companies are Symantec customers. In fiscal 2015, it recorded revenues of $6.5 billion. To learn more mosey to www.symantec.com or connect with Symantec at: http://www.symantec.com/social/

    NOTE TO EDITORS: If you would enjoy additional information on Symantec Corporation and its products, tickle visit the Symantec advice leeway at http://www.symantec.com/news. whole prices celebrated are in U.S. dollars and are valid only in the United States.

    Symantec and the Symantec Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Symantec Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This press release contains statements regarding their pecuniary and industry results and plans, which may be considered forward-looking within the sense of the U.S. federal securities laws. These comprehend statements regarding their plot to separate into two publicly traded companies, as well as projections of future revenue, operating margin and earnings per share, amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, stock-based compensation, and restructuring, separation and transition charges. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may antecedent their actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to vary materially from results expressed or implied in this press release. Such risk factors comprehend those related to: universal economic conditions; risks related to the planned separation of the company into the security industry and the information management business; maintaining customer and confederate relationships; the anticipated growth of inescapable market segments, particularly with esteem to security and storage; the competitive environment in the software industry; changes to operating systems and product strategy by vendors of operating systems; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; the timing and market acceptance of recent product releases and upgrades; the successful development of recent products and integration of acquired businesses, and the degree to which these products and businesses gain market acceptance. Actual results may vary materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements in this press release. They assume no obligation, and finish not intend, to update these forward-looking statements as a result of future events or developments. Additional information concerning these and other risks factors is contained in the Risk Factors sections of their form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2014 and their form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 2, 2015.

    USE OF NON-GAAP pecuniary INFORMATION: Their results of operations Have undergone significant change due to the repercussion of stock-based compensation, charges related to the amortization of intangible assets, and inescapable other income and expense items that management considers unrelated to the Company’s core operations, including restructuring, separation and transition costs. To serve their readers understand their past pecuniary performance and their future results, they supplement the pecuniary results that they provide in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, with non-GAAP pecuniary measures. The system they consume to yield non-GAAP results is not computed according to GAAP and may vary from the methods used by other companies. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental, should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP and should be read only in conjunction with their consolidated pecuniary statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Their management team uses these non-GAAP pecuniary measures in assessing the Company’s operating results, as well as when planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of their non-GAAP pecuniary measures to the comparable GAAP results, which is attached to their quarterly earnings release and which can be found, along with other pecuniary information, on the investor relations page of their website at http://www.symantec.com/invest.

                  SYMANTEC CORPORATION Condensed Consolidated poise Sheets (Dollars in millions, unaudited)           April 3, March 28,

    2015

     

    2014 (1)

      ASSETS   Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,874 $ 3,707 Short-term investments 1,017 377 Trade accounts receivable, net 993 1,007 Deferred income taxes 152 142 Deferred commissions 131 115 Other current assets   255     304   Total current assets   5,422     5,652     Property and equipment, net 1,205 1,116 Intangible assets, net 628 768 Goodwill 5,847 5,858 Long-term deferred commissions 26 21 Other long-term assets   105     124   Total assets $ 13,233   $ 13,539     LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY   Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 213 $ 282 Accrued compensation and benefits 398 365 Deferred revenue 3,109 3,322 Current portion of long-term debt 350 - Other current liabilities   383     337   Total current liabilities   4,453     4,306     Long-term debt 1,746 2,095 Long-term deferred revenue 555 581 Long-term deferred tax liabilities 308 425 Long-term income taxes payable 134 252 Other long-term obligations   102     83   Total liabilities   7,298     7,742         Total stockholders' equity   5,935     5,797   Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 13,233   $ 13,539               (1) Derived from audited consolidated pecuniary statements.             SYMANTEC CORPORATION Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (In millions, except per share data, unaudited)   Year-Over-Year Three Months Ended   Growth Rate April 3, March 28, Constant

    2015

     

    2014

      Actual   Currency (1)   Net revenue: Content, subscription, and maintenance $ 1,318 $ 1,433 -8 % -1 % License   200       192     4 %   13 % Total net revenue   1,518       1,625     -7 %   0 %   Cost of revenue: Content, subscription, and maintenance 240 249 License 34 20 Amortization of intangible assets   13       13          

    Total cost of revenue

      287       282     2 %   6 % Gross profit   1,231       1,343     -8 %   -1 %   Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 551 585 Research and development 293 277 General and administrative 89 115 Amortization of intangible assets 25 28 Restructuring, separation, and transition   121       32          

    Total operating expenses

      1,079       1,037     4 %   9 % Operating income   152       306     -50 %   -34 %   Interest income 3 3 Interest expense (19 ) (19 ) Other income, net   7       8           Income before income taxes   143       298     -52 %   N/A     Income tax (benefit) expense   (33 )     81           Net income $ 176     $ 217     -19 %   N/A     Net income per share -- basic $ 0.26 $ 0.31   Net income per share -- diluted $ 0.25 $ 0.31   Weighted-average shares outstanding -- basic 684 693   Weighted-average shares outstanding -- diluted 693 700   Cash dividends declared per common share   $ 0.15     $ 0.15             (1) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates. They compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in order to provide a framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed excluding the sequel of alien currency rate fluctuations. To present this information, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods.             SYMANTEC CORPORATION Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (In millions, except per share data, unaudited)  

    Year-Over-Year

    Year Ended  

    Growth Rate (1)

    April 3, March 28,

    Constant

    2015

      2014  

    Actual

      Currency (2)   Net revenue: Content, subscription, and maintenance $ 5,749 $ 5,960 -4 % -1 % License   759       716     6 %   10 % Total net revenue   6,508       6,676     -3 %   0 %   Cost of revenue: Content, subscription, and maintenance 988 1,008 License 114 87 Amortization of intangible assets   51       54           Total cost of revenue   1,153       1,149     0 %   2 % Gross profit   5,355       5,527     -3 %   -1 %   Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 2,323 2,439 Research and development 1,144 1,039 General and administrative 379 446 Amortization of intangible assets 108 156 Restructuring, separation, and transition   252       264           Total operating expenses   4,206       4,344     -3 %   -2 % Operating income   1,149       1,183     -3 %   3 %   Interest income 12 12 Interest expense (79 ) (84 ) Other income, net   11       45           Income before income taxes   1,093       1,156     -5 %   N/A     Provision for income taxes   215       258           Net income $ 878     $ 898     -2 %   N/A     Net income per share -- basic $ 1.27 $ 1.29   Net income per share -- diluted $ 1.26 $ 1.28   Weighted-average shares outstanding -- basic 689 696   Weighted-average shares outstanding -- diluted 696 704   Cash dividends declared per common share   $ 0.60     $ 0.60             (1) They Have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year. The year ended April 3, 2015 consisted of 53 weeks, whereas the year ended March 28, 2014 consisted of 52 weeks.   (2) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates. They compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in order to provide a framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed excluding the sequel of alien currency rate fluctuations. To present this information, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Dollars in millions, unaudited)     Year Ended April 3, March 28, 2015   2014   OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 878 $ 898   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 280 281 Amortization of intangible assets 159 210 Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts 4 7 Stock-based compensation expense 195 156 Deferred income taxes

    (23

    ) 47 Excess income tax profit from the exercise of stock options (10 ) (17 ) Net gain from sale of short-term investments - (32 ) Other 10 8 Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: Trade accounts receivable, net (38 ) 30 Deferred commissions (30 ) 26 Accounts payable (65 ) (75 ) Accrued compensation and benefits 49 (58 ) Deferred revenue 19 (223 ) Income taxes payable

    (191

    ) 7 Other assets 22 (11 ) Other liabilities   53       27   Net cash provided by operating activities   1,312       1,281     INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchases of property and equipment (381 ) (260 ) Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and purchases of intangibles (39 ) (17 ) Purchases of short-term investments (1,758 ) (492 ) Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments 681 117 Proceeds from sales of short-term investments   343       69   Net cash used in investing activities   (1,154 )     (583 )   FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Repayments of debt and other obligations (21 ) (1,189 ) Proceeds from convertible note hedge - 189 Net proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock profit plans 116 234 Excess income tax profit from the exercise of stock options 10 17 Tax payments related to restricted stock units (47 ) (45 ) Dividends paid, net (413 ) (418 ) Repurchases of common stock (500 ) (500 ) Proceeds from other financing, net   44       -   Net cash used in financing activities   (811 )     (1,712 )   Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents   (180 )     36   Change in cash and cash equivalents (833 ) (978 ) Beginning cash and cash equivalents   3,707       4,685   Ending cash and cash equivalents $ 2,874     $ 3,707         SYMANTEC CORPORATION Reconciliation of Selected GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures (1) (2) (In millions, except per share data, unaudited)                     Year-Over-Year Three Months Ended     Non-GAAP Growth Rate April 3, 2015     March 28, 2014   Constant GAAP   Adj   Non-GAAP     GAAP   Adj   Non-GAAP     Actual   Currency (3)   Net revenue $ 1,518     $ 30     $ 1,548       $ 1,625     $ 25     $ 1,650       -6 %   1 %   Gross profit: $ 1,231 $ 49 $ 1,280 $ 1,343 $ 44 $ 1,387 -8 % -1 % EDS & NDI contingency 30 - GSA investigation - 25 Stock-based compensation 6 6 Amortization of intangible assets       13                 13                   Gross margin %   81.1 %     1.6 %     82.7 %       82.6 %     1.5 %     84.1 %     -140 bps   -100 bps   Operating expenses: $ 1,079 $ 195 $ 884 $ 1,037 $ 99 $ 938 -6 % -2 % Stock-based compensation 49 39

    Amortization of intangible assets

     

     

     

     

    25

     

     

     

     

    28

     

     

     

     

     

    Restructuring, separation, and transition       121                 32                   Operating expenses as a % of revenue   71.1 %     -14.0 %     57.1 %       63.8 %     -7.0 %     56.8 %     30 bps   -130 bps   Operating income $ 152     $ 244     $ 396       $ 306     $ 143     $ 449       -12 %   1 %   Operating margin %   10.0 %     15.6 %     25.6 %       18.8 %     8.4 %     27.2 %     -160 bps   30 bps   Net income: $ 176 $ 123 $ 299 $ 217 $ 116 $ 333 -10 % N/A Gross profit adjustment 49 44 Operating expense adjustment 195 99 Income tax sequel on above items       (121 )               (27 )                 Diluted net income per share $ 0.25     $ 0.18     $ 0.43       $ 0.31     $ 0.17     $ 0.48       -10 %   N/A     Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding     693       -       693         700       -       700       -1 %   N/A     (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Appendix A.   (2) Non-GAAP measures for fiscal 2015 Have been revised to reflect a change in methodology that reduces the number of adjustments to GAAP measures. For a detailed explanation of this change in methodology, tickle remark “Change in non-GAAP methodology” in Appendix A.   (3) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates. They compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in order to provide a framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed excluding the sequel of alien currency rate fluctuations. To present this information, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Reconciliation of Selected GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures (1) (2) (In millions, except per share data, unaudited)                     Year-Over-Year Year Ended     Non-GAAP Growth Rate April 3, 2015     March 28, 2014   Constant GAAP   Adj   Non-GAAP     GAAP   Adj   Non-GAAP     Actual   Currency (3)   Net revenue $ 6,508     $ 30     $ 6,538       $ 6,676     $ 25     $ 6,701       -2 %   0 %   Gross profit: $ 5,355 $ 105 $ 5,460 $ 5,527 $ 98 $ 5,625 -3 % 0 % EDS & NDI contingency 30 - GSA investigation - 25 Stock-based compensation 24 19 Amortization of intangible assets       51                 54                   Gross margin %   82.3 %     1.2 %     83.5 %       82.8 %     1.1 %     83.9 %     -40 bps   -30 bps   Operating expenses: $ 4,206 $ 531 $ 3,675 $ 4,344 $ 557 $ 3,787 -3 % -2 % Stock-based compensation 171 137 Amortization of intangible assets 108 156 Restructuring, separation, and transition       252                 264                   Operating expenses as a % of revenue   64.6 %     -8.4 %     56.2 %       65.1 %     -8.6 %     56.5 %     -30 bps   -80 bps   Operating income $ 1,149     $ 636     $ 1,785       $ 1,183     $ 655     $ 1,838       -3 %   2 %   Operating margin %   17.7 %     9.6 %     27.3 %       17.7 %     9.7 %     27.4 %     -10 bps   50 bps   Net income: $ 878 $ 433 $ 1,311 $ 898 $ 472 $ 1,370 -4 % N/A Gross profit adjustment 105 98 Operating expense adjustment 531 557 Income tax sequel on above items       (203 )               (183 )                 Diluted net income per share $ 1.26     $ 0.62     $ 1.88       $ 1.28     $ 0.67     $ 1.95       -4 %   N/A     Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding     696       -       696         704       -       704       -1 %   N/A     (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Appendix A.   (2) Non-GAAP measures for fiscal 2015 Have been revised to reflect a change in methodology that reduces the number of adjustments to GAAP measures. For a detailed explanation of this change in methodology, tickle remark “Change in non-GAAP methodology” in Appendix A.   (3) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates. They compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in order to provide a framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed excluding the sequel of alien currency rate fluctuations. To present this information, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Revenue and Deferred Revenue Detail (1) (2) (Dollars in millions, unaudited)               Three Months Ended April 3, 2015 March 28, 2014 GAAP   Adj (3)   Non-GAAP GAAP   Adj (4)   Non-GAAP Revenue                           Content, subscription, and maintenance $ 1,318 $ 30 $ 1,348 $ 1,433 $ 21 $ 1,454 License     200       -       200         192       4       196   Total Revenue   $ 1,518     $ 30     $ 1,548       $ 1,625     $ 25     $ 1,650   Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate                           Content, subscription, and maintenance -8 % 1 % -7 % -6 % 1 % -5 % License     4 %     -2 %     2 %       -13 %     2 %     -11 % Total Y/Y Growth Rate     -7 %     1 %     -6 %       -7 %     1 %     -6 % Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)                           Content, subscription, and maintenance -1 % 0 % -1 % -6 % 1 % -5 % License     13 %     -3 %     10 %       -14 %     2 %   -12 % Total Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)     0 %     1 %     1 %       -7 %     1 %   -6 %                             Revenue by Segment (6)                           Consumer Security $ 408 $ 30 $ 438 $ 504 $ - $ 504 Enterprise Security 491 - 491 511 10 521 Information Management     619       -       619         610       15       625   Revenue by Segment - Y/Y Growth Rate (6)                           Consumer Security -19 % 6 % -13 % -5 % 0 % -5 % Enterprise Security -4 % -2 % -6 % -6 % 2 % -4 % Information Management     1 %     -2 %     -1 %       -10 %     3 %     -7 % Revenue by Segment - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5) (6)                           Consumer Security -13 % 6 % -7 % -5 % 0 % -5 % Enterprise Security 2 % -2 % 0 % -6 % 2 % -4 % Information Management     9 %     -3 %     6 %       -10 %     2 %     -8 %                             Revenue by Geography                           International $ 758 $ - $ 758 $ 847 $ - $ 847 U.S. 760 30 790 778 25 803 Americas (U.S., Latin America, Canada) 855 30 885 880 25 905 EMEA 399 - 399 470 - 470 Asia Pacific & Japan     264       -       264         275       -       275   Revenue by Geography - Y/Y Growth Rate                           International -11 % 0 % -11 % -6 % 0 % -6 % U.S. -2 % 0 % -2 % -9 % 3 % -6 % Americas (U.S., Latin America, Canada) -3 % 1 % -2 % -8 % 3 % -5 % EMEA -15 % 0 % -15 % -3 % 0 % -3 % Asia Pacific & Japan     -4 %     0 %     -4 %       -11 %     0 %     -11 % Revenue by Geography - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)                           International 2 % 0 % 2 % -6 % 0 % -6 % U.S. -2 % 1 % -1 % -9 % 3 % -6 % Americas (U.S., Latin America, Canada) -3 % 1 % -2 % -8 % 3 % -5 % EMEA 3 % 0 % 3 % -6 % 0 % -6 % Asia Pacific & Japan     6 %     0 %     6 %       -6 %     0 %     -6 %                             Deferred Revenue   $ 3,664     $ -     $ 3,664       $ 3,903     $ -     $ 3,903   Deferred Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate     -6 %     0 %     -6 %       -4 %     0 %     -4 % Deferred Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)     1 %     0 %     1 %       -6 %     0 %     -6 %   (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Symantec’s Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures in Appendix A.   (2) Non-GAAP measures for fiscal 2015 Have been revised to reflect a change in methodology that reduces the number of adjustments to GAAP measures. For a detailed explanation of this change in methodology, tickle remark “change in non-GAAP methodology” in Symantec’s Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures in Appendix A.   (3) The revenue adjustment relates to the EDS & NDI contingency. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (4) The revenue adjustment relates to the GSA investigation. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (5) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates. They compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in order to provide a framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed. To exclude the effects of alien currency rate fluctuations, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods (or, in the case of deferred revenue, converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rate in sequel at the halt of the prior period).   (6) This presentation includes revised amounts from a change in segment reporting. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Operating Margin by Segment Detail (1) (2) (3) (Dollars in millions, unaudited)                 Three Months Ended April 3, 2015 March 28, 2014     GAAP   Adj (4)   Non-GAAP GAAP   Adj (5)   Non-GAAP Operating Income by Segment                       Consumer Security $ 212 $ 30 $ 242 $ 255 $ - $ 255 Enterprise Security 47 - 47 69 10 79 Information Management     107       -       107         100       15       115   Total Operating Income by Segment     366       30       396         424       25       449   Reconciling Items: Stock-based compensation 55 (55 ) - 45 (45 ) - Amortization of intangible assets 38 (38 ) - 41 (41 ) - Restructuring, separation, and transition     121       (121 )     -         32       (32 )     -   Total Consolidated Operating Income   $ 152     $ 244     $ 396       $ 306     $ 143     $ 449                               Operating Margin by Segment                           Consumer Security 52 % 3 % 55 % 51 % 0 % 51 % Enterprise Security 10 % 0 % 10 % 14 % 1 % 15 % Information Management     17 %     0 %     17 %       16 %     2 %     18 %   (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Appendix A.   (2) Non-GAAP measures for fiscal 2015 Have been revised to reflect a change in methodology that reduces the number of adjustments to GAAP measures. For a detailed explanation of this change in methodology, tickle remark “Change in non-GAAP methodology” in Appendix A.   (3) This presentation includes revised amounts from a change in segment reporting. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (4) The revenue adjustment relates to the EDS & NDI contingency. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (5) The revenue adjustment relates to the GSA investigation. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Revenue and Deferred Revenue Detail (1) (2) (Dollars in millions, unaudited)                   Year Ended April 3, 2015 March 28, 2014 GAAP   Adj (3)   Non-GAAP GAAP   Adj (4)   Non-GAAP Revenue                           Content, subscription, and maintenance $ 5,749 $ 30 $ 5,779 $ 5,960 $ 21 $ 5,981 License     759       -       759         716       4       720   Total Revenue   $ 6,508     $ 30     $ 6,538       $ 6,676     $ 25     $ 6,701   Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate                           Content, subscription, and maintenance -4 % 1 % -3 % -1 % 0 % -1 % License     6 %     -1 %     5 %       -19 %     0 %     -19 % Total Y/Y Growth Rate     -3 %     1 %     -2 %       -3 %     0 %     -3 % Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)                           Content, subscription, and maintenance -1 % 0 % -1 % -1 % 1 % 0 % License     10 %     -1 %     9 %       -19 %     0 %     -19 % Total Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)     0 %     0 %     0 %       -3 %     0 %     -3 %                             Revenue by Segment (6)                           Consumer Security $ 1,887 $ 30 $ 1,917 $ 2,063 $ - $ 2,063 Enterprise Security 2,063 - 2,063 2,100 10 2,110 Information Management     2,558       -       2,558         2,513       15       2,528   Revenue by Segment - Y/Y Growth Rate (6)                           Consumer Security -9 % 2 % -7 % -2 % 0 % -2 % Enterprise Security -2 % 0 % -2 % -3 % 0 % -3 % Information Management     2 %     -1 %     1 %       -4 %     0 %     -4 % Revenue by Segment - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5) (6)                           Consumer Security -6 % 1 % -5 % -1 % 0 % -1 % Enterprise Security 0 % 0 % 0 % -2 % 0 % -2 % Information Management     4 %     0 %     4 %       -5 %     1 %     -4 %                             Revenue by Geography                           International $ 3,338 $ - $ 3,338 $ 3,478 $ - $ 3,478 U.S. 3,170 30 3,200 3,198 25 3,223 Americas (U.S., Latin America, Canada) 3,586 30 3,616 3,617 25 3,642 EMEA 1,813 - 1,813 1,891 - 1,891 Asia Pacific & Japan     1,109       -       1,109         1,168       -       1,168   Revenue by Geography - Y/Y Growth Rate                           International -4 % 0 % -4 % -3 % 0 % -3 % U.S. -1 % 0 % -1 % -4 % 1 % -3 % Americas (U.S., Latin America, Canada) -1 % 0 % -1 % -3 % 0 % -3 % EMEA -4 % 0 % -4 % 2 % 0 % 2 % Asia Pacific & Japan     -5 %     0 %     -5 %       -10 %     0 %     -10 % Revenue by Geography - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)                           International 0 % 0 % 0 % -2 % 0 % -2 % U.S. -1 % 0 % -1 % -4 % 1 % -3 % Americas (U.S., Latin America, Canada) -1 % 0 % -1 % -3 % 0 % -3 % EMEA 1 % 0 % 1 % -2 % 0 % -2 % Asia Pacific & Japan     0 %     0 %     0 %       -4 %     0 %     -4 %                             Deferred Revenue   $ 3,664     $ -     $ 3,664       $ 3,903     $ -     $ 3,903   Deferred Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate     -6 %     0 %     -6 %       -4 %     0 %     -4 % Deferred Revenue - Y/Y Growth Rate in Constant Currency (5)     1 %     0 %     1 %       -6 %     0 %     -6 %   (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Symantec’s Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures in Appendix A.   (2) Non-GAAP measures for fiscal 2015 Have been revised to reflect a change in methodology that reduces the number of adjustments to GAAP measures. For a detailed explanation of this change in methodology, tickle remark “change in non-GAAP methodology” in Symantec’s Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures in Appendix A.   (3) The revenue adjustment relates to the EDS & NDI contingency. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (4) The revenue adjustment relates to the GSA investigation. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (5) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates. They compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in order to provide a framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed. To exclude the effects of alien currency rate fluctuations, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods (or, in the case of deferred revenue, converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rate in sequel at the halt of the prior period).   (6) This presentation includes revised amounts from a change in segment reporting. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Operating Margin by Segment Detail (1) (2) (3) (Dollars in millions, unaudited)                 Year Ended April 3, 2015 March 28, 2014     GAAP   Adj (4)   Non-GAAP GAAP   Adj (5)   Non-GAAP Operating Income by Segment                           Consumer Security $ 982 $ 30 $ 1,012 $ 928 $ - $ 928 Enterprise Security 287 - 287 314 10 324 Information Management     486       -       486         571       15       586   Total Operating Income by Segment     1,755       30       1,785         1,813       25       1,838   Reconciling Items: Stock-based compensation 195 (195 ) - 156 (156 ) - Amortization of intangible assets 159 (159 ) - 210 (210 ) - Restructuring, separation, and transition     252       (252 )     -         264       (264 )     -   Total Consolidated Operating Income   $ 1,149     $ 636     $ 1,785       $ 1,183     $ 655     $ 1,838                               Operating Margin by Segment                           Consumer Security 52 % 1 % 53 % 45 % 0 % 45 % Enterprise Security 14 % 0 % 14 % 15 % 0 % 15 % Information Management     19 %     0 %     19 %       23 %     0 %     23 %   (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Appendix A.   (2) Non-GAAP measures for fiscal 2015 Have been revised to reflect a change in methodology that reduces the number of adjustments to GAAP measures. For a detailed explanation of this change in methodology, tickle remark “Change in non-GAAP methodology” in Appendix A.   (3) This presentation includes revised amounts from a change in segment reporting. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (4) The revenue adjustment relates to the EDS & NDI contingency. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.   (5) The revenue adjustment relates to the GSA investigation. tickle remark Appendix A for more details.       SYMANTEC CORPORATION Guidance and Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Operating Margin and Earnings Per Share (1) (Dollars in millions, except per share data, unaudited)   Fiscal Year 2016 Revenue Guidance   Year Ended April 1, 2016   Year-Over-Year Growth Rate (2) (3)   Range   Actual   Constant Currency (4) (5)   Revenue range   $6,210 - $6,350  

    (5.0)% - (2.9)%

     

    0.0% - 2.3%

                  Year Ended April 1, 2016 Year-Over-Year increase (Decrease) (2) Operating Margin Guidance and Reconciliation   Range   Actual   Constant Currency (4) (5)   GAAP operating margin 14.5% - 15.5% (320) bps - (220) bps (108) bps - (8) bps Add back: Stock-based compensation 4.6% Other non-GAAP adjustments 9.9%         Non-GAAP operating margin   29.0% - 30.0%   170 bps - 270 bps   330 bps - 430 bps               Year Ended April 1, 2016 Year-Over-Year Growth Rate (2) Earnings Per Share Guidance and Reconciliation   Range   Actual   GAAP diluted earnings per share range $0.86 - $0.96 (31.7)% - (23.8)% Add back: Stock-based compensation, net of taxes $0.30 Other non-GAAP adjustments, net of taxes $0.64     Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share range   $1.80 - $1.90   (4.3)% - 1.1%   First Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Revenue Guidance Three Months Ended July 3, 2015 Year-Over-Year Growth Rate (2)   Range   Actual   Constant Currency (4) (5)   Revenue range   $1,500 - $1,540   (13.5)% - (11.2)%  

    (0.5)% - 2.1%

                  Three Months Ended July 3, 2015 Year-Over-Year increase (Decrease) (2) Operating Margin Guidance and Reconciliation   Range   Actual   Constant Currency (4) (5)   GAAP operating margin 14.0% - 15.0% (460) bps - (360) bps 33 bps - 134 bps Add back: Stock-based compensation 3.7% Other non-GAAP adjustments 9.3%         Non-GAAP operating margin   27.0% - 28.0%   240 bps - 340 bps   635 bps - 735 bps               Three Months Ended July 3, 2015 Year-Over-Year Growth Rate (2) Earnings Per Share Guidance and Reconciliation   Range   Actual   GAAP diluted earnings per share range $0.20 - $0.23 (41.2)% - (32.4)% Add back: Stock-based compensation, net of taxes $0.06 Other non-GAAP adjustments, net of taxes $0.15     Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share range   $0.41 - $0.44   (8.9)% - (2.2)%   (1) This presentation includes non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP. For a detailed explanation of these non-GAAP measures, tickle remark Appendix A.   (2) They Have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year. The fiscal year ended April 1, 2016 consists of 52 weeks, whereas the fiscal year ended April 3, 2015 consisted of 53 weeks. The quarter ended July 3, 2015 consists of 13 weeks, whereas the quarter ended July 4, 2014 consisted of 14 weeks.   (3) Growth rates are calculated using fiscal year 2015 non-GAAP revenue.   (4) Management refers to growth rates adjusting for currency fluctuations in alien currency exchange rates so that the industry results can be viewed without the repercussion of these fluctuations. They compare the percent change of the results from one period to another period in order to provide a consistent framework for assessing how their underlying businesses performed. To exclude the effects of alien currency rate fluctuations, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than United States dollars are converted into United States dollars at the actual exchange rates in sequel during the respective prior periods.   (5) These calculations are adjusted for the extra week in the June 2014 quarter.  

    SYMANTEC CORPORATION

    Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures and Other Items

    Appendix A

    Segment reporting: In fiscal 2015, they are focused on managing their businesses as a portfolio and optimizing inescapable businesses for margin or growth. As a result, they formed a recent consumer group and they consolidated their enterprise security businesses into a segment. They modified their segment reporting structure to match their operating structure in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The historical periods presented Have been adjusted to reflect the recent reporting structure, which is now:

    • Consumer Security

    • Enterprise Security

    • Information Management

    Consumer Security consists of their consumer security businesses that were previously reported in User Productivity & Protection. Enterprise Security consists of their enterprise security businesses that were previously reported in User Productivity & Protection and Information Security. There were no changes to the Information Management segment.

    Objective of non-GAAP measures: They believe their presentation of non-GAAP pecuniary measures, when taken together with corresponding GAAP pecuniary measures, provides meaningful supplemental information regarding the Company’s operating performance for the reasons discussed below. Their management team uses these non-GAAP pecuniary measures in assessing the Company’s operating results, as well as when planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods. They believe that these non-GAAP pecuniary measures moreover facilitate comparisons of the Company’s performance to prior periods and to their peers and that investors profit from an understanding of the non-GAAP pecuniary measures. Non-GAAP pecuniary measures are supplemental and should not be considered a substitute for pecuniary information presented in accordance with GAAP.

    Change in non-GAAP methodology: From time to time, the Company performs a comprehensive review of its non-GAAP pecuniary measures. efficacious in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, non-GAAP pecuniary measures are adjusted for the following items: stock-based compensation expense; charges related to the amortization of intangible assets; inescapable other income and expense items that management considers unrelated to the Company’s core operations; and the associated income tax effects of the adjustments. By limiting the number and nature of adjustments, their management team believes this supplemental information will provide more meaningful insight into the performance of the Company’s core industry and enhance investors’ ability to compare the Company’s performance to its peers. The adoption of the change in methodology has been applied retrospectively to prior periods to facilitate comparability across periods.

    Stock-based compensation: Consists of expenses for employee stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, performance based awards and their employee stock purchase plot determined in accordance with the authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation. When evaluating the performance of their individual industry units and developing short- and long-term plans, they finish not esteem stock-based compensation charges. Their management team is held accountable for cash-based compensation, but they believe that management is limited in its ability to project the repercussion of stock-based compensation and accordingly is not held accountable for its repercussion on their operating results. Although stock-based compensation is necessary to attract and retain quality employees, their consideration of stock-based compensation places its primary stress on overall shareholder dilution rather than the accounting charges associated with such grants. In addition, for comparability purposes, they believe it is useful to provide a non-GAAP pecuniary measure that excludes stock-based compensation in order to better understand the long-term performance of their core industry and to facilitate the comparison of their results to the results of their peer companies. Furthermore, unlike cash-based compensation, the value of stock-based compensation is determined using tangled formulas that incorporate factors, such as market volatility, that are beyond their control.

                        Three Months Ended April 3,   March 28,

    2015

    2014

    Cost of revenue $ 6 $ 6 Sales and marketing 20 15 Research and development 20 14 General and administrative 9   10 Total stock-based compensation $ 55 $ 45  

    Amortization of intangible assets: When conducting internal development of intangible assets, accounting rules require that they expense the costs as incurred. In the case of acquired businesses, however, they are required to allocate a portion of the purchase expense to the accounting value assigned to intangible assets acquired and amortize this amount over the estimated useful lives of the acquired intangible assets. The acquired company, in most cases, has itself previously expensed the costs incurred to develop the acquired intangible assets, and the purchase expense allocated to these assets is not necessarily reflective of the cost they would incur in developing the intangible asset. They liquidate these amortization charges from their non-GAAP operating results to provide better comparability of pre- and post-acquisition operating results and comparability to results of businesses utilizing internally developed intangible assets.

    Restructuring, separation, and transition: They Have engaged in various restructuring, separation, and transition activities over the past several years that Have resulted in costs associated with severance, facilities, transition, and other related costs. Separation and other related costs consist of consulting and disentanglement costs incurred to split the Company into two, independent publicly traded companies, as well as costs to prune selected product lines that finish not fit either the Company’s growth or margin objectives. Transition and other related costs consist of consulting charges associated with the implementation of recent Enterprise Resource Planning systems. Each restructuring, separation, and transition activity has been a discrete event based on a unique set of industry objectives or circumstances, and each has differed from the others in terms of its operational implementation, industry repercussion and scope. They finish not engage in restructuring, separation, or transition activities in the ordinary course of business. While their operations previously benefited from the employees and facilities covered by their various restructuring and separation charges, these employees and facilities Have benefited different parts of their industry in different ways, and the amount of these charges has varied significantly from period to period. They believe that it is valuable to understand these charges and they believe that investors profit from excluding these charges from their operating results to facilitate a more meaningful evaluation of current operating performance and comparisons to past operating performance.

    EDS & NDI contingency: On January 24, 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and its previous e-commerce vendor Digital River, Inc. The lawsuit alleged violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, the California Legal Remedies Act and unjust enrichment related to prior sales of Extended Download Service (EDS) and Norton Download Insurance (NDI). On March 31, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota certified a class of whole people who purchased these products between January 24, 2005, and March 10, 2011. In April 2015, they reached agreement in principle with the plaintiffs under which the Company will pay the plaintiffs $30 million. As they esteem this settlement amount now estimable and probable, they Have recorded it as an offset to revenue during the year ended April 3, 2015. The Company's management excluded this particular when evaluating its ongoing operating performance, and therefore excluded this loss when presenting non-GAAP pecuniary measures.

    GSA investigation: During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, they were advised by the Commercial Litigation arm of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division and the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia that the government is investigating their compliance with inescapable provisions of their U.S. universal Services Administration (“GSA”) Multiple Award Schedule condense No. GS-35F-0240T efficacious January 24, 2007, including provisions relating to pricing, country of origin, accessibility, and the disclosure of commercial sales practices. As a result of these developments, they considered the need for an accrual for a potential loss and they recorded an amount as a reduction of revenue that represents their best rate of the low halt of such range. This amount contemplates estimated losses from both the investigation of compliance with the terms of the GSA Schedule condense as well as possible violations of the incorrect Claims Act. There is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may Have been incurred in excess of their accrual for this matter, however they are currently unable to determine a gain of estimated losses resulting from this matter. The Company's management excluded this particular when evaluating its ongoing operating performance, and therefore excluded this loss when presenting non-GAAP pecuniary measures.

    Release of tax contingencies: During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 and second quarter of fiscal 2014, they realized GAAP tax benefits of $39 million and $33 million, respectively, for the resolution of tax matters related to the sale of their 49% ownership interest in the joint venture with Huawei during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. The related gain on the sale in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 was excluded from non-GAAP results and, accordingly, they Have excluded the tax profit from their non-GAAP results. This GAAP tax profit is presented in the “Income tax sequel on above items” line.

    Defined profit plans: The Company has defined profit plans in the form of company mandatory or statutory retirement and termination indemnities in alien locations including a company supplemental plot in Germany which is now frozen. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company recorded an $11 million saturate to operating expenses to adjust for gains and losses on such defined profit plans. This saturate was included in their non-GAAP results.


    Information Governance Should be Top Priority For Businesses | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

    tarunkaura

    Information storage is going through exciting times and with terabytes of data being created, shared and stored across multiple platforms, organizations are increasingly finding it difficult to manage this information diluge. In an exclusive with CXOtoday, Tarun Kaura, Director – Technology Sales, India, Symantec discusses why efficacious information storage and management will be the focus belt for great enterprises and SMBs in the coming months.

    What are the latest trends in information storage and management for the enterprise?

    Today, the explosion of Information is challenging the existing solutions deployed in enterprises. IDC forecasts that the volume of digital data will grow 40-50 percent per year clearly indicating that information storage and management will remain in vogue and a colossal focus belt for CIOs across sectors. With trends such as software defined datacenters and integrated backup appliances, expected to gain momentum and moreover as cloud based storage, backup and disaster recovery becoming commonplace, efficacious information storage and management will be a focus belt for great enterprises and SMBs in the coming months.

    What are the current information management strategies being deployed by enterprises across different verticals?

    Information is the fundamental connecting fabric of every industry today, as more and more companies depend on IT to elope their industry and to drive recent opportunities, while operating efficiently and complying with corporate governance practices and industry regulations. Yet, most enterprises today are not organized around information, as they mosey their focus on the servers, storage and applications.

    For instance, the automobile industry deals with an influx of information owing to their great databases for their manufacturing and sales units. As offices are spread over different locations, there is a rapid growth in data volumes of emails, in both mail storage and Microsoft Exchange databases which drains the company’s finances and slows the overall systems. Often, the current solution being deployed includes individual solutions across different platforms. The result - information islands – an inability to secure and manage information consistently, leading to duplication, inefficiency and the inability to consume information for efficiency and competitive advantage.

    Similarly for BFSI sector which deals with a lot of confidential data on a daily basis, requires efficient management of data not just to protect the confidentiality of the user, but moreover to manage one’s own brand reputation.

    The time for better information management is now - without it, storage costs spiral, information becomes harder to find, risks of legal action and privacy breaches escalate, and the recur on virtualization is diminished.

    What are the key challenges for businesses in information management?

    The sheer volume of information and its continued growth is one of the main challenges for businesses. Though the volume of information generated, increases every year, IT budgets cannot withhold up with the very and IT teams are expected to finish more with the very staffing levels. At the very time, failure to properly secure and manage information is landing enterprise into trouble, because halting information flow means halting business. Information outages and data breaches are therefore common in the enterprise. To manage the avalanche of information, organizations should develop an efficacious information governance program, designed to provide top-down support for the smart maintenance of the company’s data requirements.

    How can enterprises fit an efficacious information management strategy?

    While adopting the birthright technologies is vital in an efficacious information management strategy, there are a number of areas enterprises need to focus on. First of all, organizations should establish the C-level owner of information governance, who can build an information-responsible culture and create an umbrella of information governance to capture synergies across focused projects. CIOs and other decision makers can govern information to achieve industry goals and overcome challenges. They should win a broader perspective of information governance and work outside of silos. Information governance should be high on the organization’s list of priorities.

    Secondly, businesses should concentrate on focused projects such as eDiscovery, compliance, archiving and DLP besides having a powerful deduplication strategy for backups and archive. It’s moreover valuable to comprehend security (in addition to retention and eDiscovery) as Part of the strategy.

    Finally, businesses should manage information according to its minute to your industry by classifying information that are apropos and valuable for the organization.

    Tell us about Symantec’s latest offerings in Storage space.

    The growth of mission-critical data and applications, supporting real-time decision-making, is driving SSD adoption to increase performance within the data center. They recently announced a recent version of their Storage Foundation software, Storage Foundation 6.1, which will enable data centers to leverage Solid State Drives (SSDs), in ways that could allow customers to access mission captious data and applications 400 percent faster than traditional Storage belt Networks (SANs). Similarly, another recent solution NetBackup 7.6 has moreover been designed for enterprise even scale, which can accommodate hundreds and thousands of virtual machines and petabytes of data while giving customers 400x faster virtual machine recovery than a standard restore.

    What is Symantec’s growth strategy for next one year?

    The technology landscape is constantly evolving as the lines between physical and virtual infrastructures continue to blur, and they believe that they are equipped to capitalize on these developments and deliver the best solutions for their customers. Their Information Management strategy for the coming year broadly focuses on three areas - Availability, Protection and Insight. Each category has independent toolsets designed to efficiently serve their customers, while choosing the platforms that work best for their business. They will continue to focus on these aspects in the coming months.


    Catching up with deduplication | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Deduplication backup products vary in how they recognize and reduce duplicate data. Here's how to pick the product that will best fit into your environment.

    Backup has seen the future and it's disk. As the backup target gradually, but persistently, changes from tape to disk, data deduplication is becoming a key component of the backup process. Because vendors implement deduplication differently, the fear, uncertainty and doubt surrounding deduplication products has increased as Have the questions about when to deploy what product.

    Deduplication resides in the backup process in two primary places: backup software and disk libraries. Asigra Inc.'s Televaulting, EMC Corp.'s Avamar and Symantec Corp.'s Veritas NetBackup PureDisk are backup software products that deduplicate data at the host level, minimizing the amount of data that needs to be sent over corporate networks to backup targets or replicated to disaster recovery sites. Disk libraries from Data Domain Inc., Diligent Technologies Corp., Quantum Corp. and Sepaton Inc. deduplicate data at the target, which allows companies to deploy disk libraries without disrupting current backup processes.

    With the underlying deduplication algorithms essentially the very across both sets of products, the existent issues are how each product implementation impacts performance, and data management in the short and long term. Neither approach is yet exemplar for whole backup requirements, so a crossover period is emerging in which some storage managers will likely consume backup software and disk library methods for specific needs. Hidden issues enjoy undeduplicating data to store it on tape, integration with enterprise backup software products, and the ability to selectively turn off deduplication to accommodate specific compliance requirements and preexisting encryption conditions should be evaluated closely to determine whether those issues outweigh the benefits of deduplication.

    Data reduction and compression algorithms

    Backup software and disk library products deduplicate data in similar ways, with most using a combination of data-reduction and compression algorithms. Both types of deduplication approaches initially identify whether chunks of data or files are the very by first performing a file-level compare or using a hashing algorithm such as MD5 or SHA-1. Unique files or data chunks are preserved, while duplicate files or data chunks may be optionally rechecked. This recheck is done using a bit-level comparison or secondary hash to ensure the data is truly a duplicate and not a rare hash collision. This first stage in the deduplication process typically reduces data stores by factors of approximately 10 or more over time.

    To achieve data-reduction factors of 20 times or greater requires the product to compress the unique deduplicated files or data chunks. To accomplish this, vendors consume a lossless data compression algorithm, such as Huffman coding or Lempel-Ziv coding, which executes against the unique file or deduplicated data chunk. Compression squeezes out items enjoy leading zeros or spaces to reduce the data to its smallest possible footprint before it's stored.

    However, using deduplication at the source or target introduces performance and management issues. Backup software-based deduplication products insert a cumbersome initial processing toll on the host. In addition, users should carefully examine how swapping current backup software with a deduplication backup product, or running two backup software products concurrently, will impress server and application performance, as well as their stability.

    Conversely, deduplicating data on a disk library may require users to deploy multiple disk libraries to wield the performance overhead created during peak backup periods. This creates more management overhead as each disk library creates its own unique deduplicated data store; administrators must moreover manage and direct backup jobs to multiple physical disk libraries as opposed to just one ratiocinative one. Determining which backup software, disk library or combination of them to select, and under what circumstances, is how they wield these potential bottlenecks.

    Breaking the bottlenecks

    Asigra Televaulting attempts to split the management bottleneck by taking an agentless approach that expedites deployments while minimizing user involvement. Users initially install the Asigra Televaulting gateway software on a Windows or Linux server. The Televaulting backup software accesses client files over the internal network using CIFS, NFS or SSH (SSH allows for security but is slower) and reads the files. As it reads each file, the Asigra Televaulting server performs a hash on the file. If the file is determined to be unique, the file is chunked up with its unique blocks stored while redundant blocks are indexed and thrown away.

    All hash processing takes location on the Asigra Televaulting server, which maintains a database of whole of the unique file blocks on the different servers it's assigned to protect. Once the initial backup and index is done, subsequent server backups execute faster because they can consume this common repository of unique blocks created from the first server's backup.

    This approach still doesn't completely liquidate the performance toll of deduplication. By running the deduplication on a central server, the Televaulting software transfers the performance overhead from the client servers to the Televaulting server. Multiple servers with unusually great daily data change rates (more than 10%) or great numbers of servers (100 or more) needing to elope backups at the very time could repercussion backup times and oblige the deployment of more Asigra Televaulting servers to manage the overhead.

    EMC Avamar and Symantec Veritas NetBackup PureDisk win a slightly different approach to address the performance issue. They consume agents that utilize computing resources on each client server to finish the initial file hash. As Part of this process, the agents communicate with the main backup server, which maintains a central database of the unique file hashes. As the Avamar or PureDisk agents on the servers hash the files, they check with the central server to remark if the generated hash already exists. If the hash exists, the agent ignores the file; if it doesn't exist, it breaks the file into smaller segments and looks for recent unique file segments to store. From that point, EMC Avamar and PureDisk deviate in their product implementation.

    EMC Avamar allows server storage capacity to grow to approximately 1.5TB in size. Although Symantec Veritas NetBackup PureDisk servers can grow to manage nearly 4TB of PureDisk storage capacity, EMC Avamar uses segment sizes that are about one-fourth the size of PureDisk's. This allows it to better identify redundant data in files, asserts Jed Yueh, EMC Avamar's VP of product management. If users should need to grow in capacity and scale, EMC Avamar uses a redundant array of independent nodes (RAIN) clustering architecture. This allows organizations to add more server nodes into the RAIN cluster to increase server capacity and performance by striping the data across multiple nodes.

    In a PureDisk environment, a single server can manage 4TB of PureDisk storage and up to 100 million files which equates, according to Symantec, to a exiguous more than 80TB of source data. Additional servers can be added to expand PureDisk's storage capacity or to wield larger number of files.

    PureDisk manages file meta data outside of the file system using MetaBase Server and MetaBase Engines. As an environment grows, a storage manager uses PureDisk to add recent instances of MetaBase Engines; because the MetaBase Server controls communication to whole MetaBase Engines, expanding the deduplication environment is a relatively simple process. This separation of the file meta data from the file system allows PureDisk to ameliorate search- and maintenance-related activities on the underlying storage system, grow to hundreds of terabytes and billions of files, and retain a single ratiocinative instance of deduplicated data across the enterprise.

    Early adopters

    Early adopters of EMC Avamar and Symantec Veritas NetBackup PureDisk report minimal issues with installing backup software agents or server performance hits, but there are some specific circumstances that they monitor more carefully: the initial round of backups and the age of the server on which agents are deployed.

    Jim Rose, manager of systems administration with the State of Indiana's Office of Technology, recently installed PureDisk at arm state offices as Part of a mandate by Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels to centralize inescapable IT functions. At each of the 80 offices he manages, Rose installed a Microsoft Windows server with PureDisk software, as well as PureDisk agents on each of the servers targeted for backup. Rose organize the backup of the initial server took between 24 hours to 36 hours, while the second backup took about half that time; by the second or third day, backup windows across whole of these servers were almost back to normal, he says.

    "Symantec PureDisk backed up recent servers without any discernable performance hit," says Rose. "[But] servers older than three years took longer to complete the initial scan."

    Michael Fair, network administrator, information technology division at St. Peter's Health keeping Services in Albany, NY, finds that the performance and management overhead associated with EMC's Avamar is almost nothing vs. what he encountered when backing up his servers with CA BrightStor and Symantec Backup Exec. "I eliminated domain controllers in eight sites and can now elope backups during the day if the need arises with no discernible repercussion to server applications," says Fair.

    Introducing PureDisk allowed the State of Indiana's Rose to back up 300 servers across 80 sites in six hours, and he now has a demonstrable, working recovery plot for those sites. However, as the individual amenable for both remote offices and enterprise data centers, he recognizes the limitations of backup software deduplication. Taking 24 hours to 36 hours to complete an initial backup, coupled with high change rates on central databases, precludes Rose from deploying PureDisk in his core data center environment. For these more mission-critical servers, he looks to disk libraries to withhold processing off the hosts.

    Inline disk libraries

    Disk libraries discharge deduplication in two universal ways: inline and postprocessing. With inline processing, the disk library processes backup streams and deduplicates the data as it enters the disk library. Inline disk libraries consume three universal deduplication methods to minimize the performance impact: hash-based, inline compare and grid architecture.

    Data Domain's DDX disk library uses a hash-based technique. DDX takes an 8KB slice of the incoming backup data and computes a hash or fingerprint value. If the fingerprint value is unique, it deduplicates and stores the data. The main issues with this approach are the performance requirements to compute the hash and keeping the hash index in memory; as the hash index grows, it spills over from reminiscence onto disk. To mitigate the performance overhead associated with retrieving the index from the disk, Data Domain developed a technique called stream-informed segment layout (SISL) that minimizes seeks to disk so the performance is CPU-centric; the faster the disk library CPU, the better the performance.

    Diligent Technologies' inline ProtecTier Data Protection Platform attempts to avoid the performance penalty required by hash lookups by doing a computational compare. Using its proprietary HyperFactor technology, it avoids opening the backup data stream to examine content and instead scans and indexes the data stream, looking for data that's similar to data already stored.

    When the ProtecTier Data Protection Platform finds data it considers similar to data already stored in its index, it does a byte-level compare of the two sets of data; if it matches, it discards the match and references it. Diligent claims this compare-and-compute technique allows its ProtecTier Data Protection Platform to scale to manage hundreds of terabytes. However, this technique still requires some processing power on the Part of the disk library to finish the computational compare and to compress the data after it has been deduplicated.

    NEC Corp. of America's Hydrastor moreover uses an inline approach, but it employs two different techniques to offset the performance overhead. In the first phase, Hydrastor deduplicates larger, variable-sized chunks of data to liquidate great pieces of redundant data. In the second phase, Hydrastor analyzes smaller, variable-sized chunks of data. In both cases, unique data is compressed.

    To compensate for the performance overhead this multiphased approach creates, Hydrastor uses a grid architecture. This allows users to add additional nodes to the cluster at any time, which are designed to deliver additional performance or capacity. Unlike some other disk libraries, Hydrastor doesn't offer an option to present itself as a virtual tape library. Rather, it presents itself to hosts as a NAS filer using standard NFS and CIFS interfaces and creates one great storage pool on the back end. The Hydrastor architecture may present a problem for those enterprises that need to allocate and reserve inescapable amounts of storage for specific departments or industry units.

    Postprocessing disk libraries

    With postprocessing, the disk library stores the data in its autochthonous format before deduplicating it, which allows the disk library to dedupe the data during nonpeak backup times. Vendors implement postprocessing in a variety of ways.

    For example, Quantum's DXi-Series deduplicates data after it's stored, but initiates the deduplication process without waiting for the entire backup job to finish. By starting deduplication and then compressing the data while the backup is still running, it overcomes one of the principle downsides of postprocessing--the requirement for sufficient capacity to house the autochthonous backups. However, deduplication requires consume of the DXi-Series' cache and processor, which can potentially late the backup process because the backup job may need to write the data directly to slower responding disk instead of storing it in the DXi-Series' cache.

    To avoid that scenario, ExaGrid Systems Inc.'s ExaGrid and Sepaton's S2100-ES2 execute only on backup sets that Have completed, so deduplication doesn't repercussion backup and restore performance. On the first analysis of backed up data, ExaGrid and S2100-ES2 only compress the data and don't deduplicate. When a second backup completes, ExaGrid does byte-level delta differencing while Sepaton uses its ContentAware software to compare objects in the first backup at byte even against similar objects in the second one. enjoy objects in the first backup are then deleted and replaced with pointers to objects in the second backup, with objects in the second backup then compressed but not deduplicated. This deduplication and compression process repeats as backups occur.

    The inequity between the two determines what size environments they best fit. You can't add more controllers to ExaGrid to allow it to deduplicate the great amounts of data that enterprise backups generate. Sepaton uses a grid architecture in S2100-ES2 so additional controllers for more processing and capacity can be added as deduplication requirements grow.

    Hidden issues

    Regardless of the deduplication approach, there are some hidden issues. For postprocessing disk libraries, as the amount of data increases, it may win much longer to deduplicate the data once the backups are complete. If the deduplication takes longer than the time between the halt of one backup window and the start of the next, whole of the data from the first backup won't be deduplicated so users will need to ensure they can add more processing power to wield this load.

    Another potential problem may arise with inline or postprocessing disk libraries that aren't replicating the data to a remote disk library: the need to create tapes. The disk library needs sufficient time to first deduplicate the data and then undeduplicate a copy of the data to be spun off to tape. Both ExaGrid Systems' ExaGrid and Sepaton's S2100-ES2 avoid this undeduplication overhead because the terminal backup is only compressed, not deduplicated, so users can copy the job directly to tape.

    Other postprocessing disk libraries enjoy Spectra Logic Corp.'s nTier appliance allow users to elope a local master or media server within their nTier appliance that alleviates some of the smart of this process. The nTier appliance eliminates the need to mosey data from host to media server to deduplication box to media server to tape, and allows the data to mosey from host to nTier appliance to tape. This design moreover eliminates the need to undeduplicate the data before storing it to tape.

    Deduplicating backup software products that must operate in conjunction with enterprise backup products enjoy Symantec Veritas NetBackup or EMC NetWorker puss a different problem--allowing the enterprise backup software product to recognize and catalog the data it has backed up. While neither Asigra Televaulting nor EMC Avamar Have any formal integration in location with any enterprise backup software product yet, Symantec Veritas NetBackup PureDisk 6.1 includes a NetBackup export engine that allows an administrator to copy a backed-up data selection from a PureDisk content router to NetBackup. NetBackup then catalogs the data and copies it to tape or disk and, from the NetBackup administration console, the storage administrator can treat those files as if they were autochthonous NetBackup files. Both EMC and Symantec anticipate tighter integration between their enterprise and deduplicating backup software products in the near future.

    A final belt of concern is the ability to selectively turn off deduplication for specific files or servers. This is valuable when compliance is an issue because the authenticity of data may Come into question if it's deduplicated in any way. Also, if data is encrypted before the disk library receives it, deduplication provides no additional space-saving benefits; users should identify ahead of time which data is encrypted before it's stored or sent to a disk library.

    As data stores continue to soar, deduplication into the backup process is rapidly evolving from a nice-to-have capability to a must-have capability for most corporate environments. The submissive advice is that for small and midsized businesses managing 10TB of data or less, using either type of deduplication product, backup software or disk library, will significantly shorten backup windows. The decision then becomes what product best fits your environment.

    At the enterprise even this isn't yet the case. Though promising work is occurring with inline approaches such as Diligent Technologies ProtecTier Data Protection Platform and NEC's Hydrastor, most enterprises will find a postprocessing disk library such as Sepaton's S2100-ES2 a safer choice for now until whole of the costs, risks and processing overhead associated with inline deduplication are better understood and documented.



    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12028207
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12916161
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2018/01/get-high-marks-in-vcs-273-exam-with.html
    Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2xj
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/d3hbgzlefn8tkg5tts32esfpeiimxdg8






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://www.radionaves.com/