Kill your exam with our [VN] 050-854 Real Questions | | Inicio RADIONAVES

Pass4sure 050-854 exam test framework is the best plan gadget anytime made It uses invigorated - - and to make the cheerful certain - - Inicio RADIONAVES

Pass4sure 050-854 dumps | Killexams.com 050-854 real questions | http://www.radionaves.com/

050-854 cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration

Study usher Prepared by Killexams.com Novell Dumps Experts


Killexams.com 050-854 Dumps and real Questions

100% real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with tall Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



050-854 exam Dumps Source : cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration

Test Code : 050-854
Test title : cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration
Vendor title : Novell
: 192 real Questions

right information and abide a view at with the 050-854 and Dumps! What a aggregate!
The snappy solutions made my coaching greater handy. I finished seventy five questions out off 80 properly beneaththe stipulated time and managed 80%. My aspiration to live an authorized purchase the exam 050-854. I were given the killexams.Com usher definitely 2 weeks in forward than the examination. Thank you.


050-854 certification examination is quite traumatic without this celebrate guide.
With most effective two weeks to stagger for my 050-854 examination, I felt so helpless considering my terrible coaching. But, needed to bypass the test badly as I desired to exchange my job. Finally, I located the question and solution by using killexams.Com which removed my issues. The content of the manual changed into moneyed and specific. The simple and short answers helped manufacture out the subjects effortlessly. magnificient manual, killexams. too took assist from 050-854 Official Cert usher and it helped.


No waste latest time on searhching net! determined precise source cutting-edge 050-854 .
I took this exam last month and passed it thanks to my preparation with the killexams.com kit. This is a magnificient exam dump, more trustworthy than I could expect. every questions are valid, and it too includes plenty of preparation info. Better and more trustworthy than I expected - I passed with over 97%, which is the best 050-854 exam score. I dont know why so few IT people know about killexams.com, or maybe its just my conservative environment Anyways, I will live spreading the word among my friends since this is magnificient and will live helpful to many.


start making ready those 050-854 questions answers and chillout.
Killexams.Com has pinnacle merchandise for college students because the ones are designed for those college students who are inquisitive about the education of 050-854 certification. It turn out to live remarkable selection due to the reality 050-854 examination engine has magnificient study contents which may live immaculate to apprehend in quick time period. I am thankful to the superb group because this helped me in my profession development. It helped me to understand the manner to solution every crucial inquiries to rep most ratings. It become outstanding selection that made me fan of killexams. Ive decided to arrive back lower back back one greater time.


Little effor required to prepare 050-854 real question bank.
Im inspired to view the feedback that 050-854 braindump is up to date. The modifications are very novel and that i did no longer anticipate to learn them everywhere. I just took my first 050-854 examination so this one can live the following step. Gonna order soon.


getting ready 050-854 examination is rely modern day some hours now.
My pals instructed me I could anticipate killexams.com for 050-854 examination preparation, and this time I did. The wit dumps are very handy to apply, i relish how they may live set up. The query order facilitates you memorize things higher. I passed with 89% marks.


What study usher finish I exigency to prepare to pass 050-854 exam?
I ought to recognize that your answers and reasons to the questions are very good. These helped me understand the basics and thereby helped me try the questions which abide been now not direct. I may want to abide handed without your question bank, but your question fiscal institution and closing day revision set abide been truely helpful. I had expected a score of ninety+, but despite the fact that scored 83.50%. Thank you.


Just try these real exam questions and success is yours.
We every know that clearing the 050-854 test is a substantial deal. I got my 050-854 test cleared that I was so content just due to killexams.com that gave me 87% marks.


I found a very magnificient source of 050-854 material.
Your question bank is exigency of the hour. I abide got 89.1% in the 050-854 exam. Very magnificient wishes for your experts. Thank you Team. so delighted to transparent this exam. Your study material was extremely useful, clear, consise, covering entire material and suberb stacking of questions to manufacture one strong preparation. Thanks again to you and your team.


found maximum 050-854 Questions in real exam that I prepared.
Asking my father to abet me with some thing is relish getting into in to huge hassle and i without a doubt didnt exigency to disturb him throughout my 050-854 coaching. I knew a person else has to abet me. I just didnt who itd live until certainly one of my cousins advised me of this Killexams.com. It become relish a extraordinary gift to me because it become extremely usefuland useful for my 050-854 check instruction. I owe my high-quality marks to the people running on here due to the fact their dedication made it viable.


Novell Novell cni-netware 5.1 advanced

King of the community operating systems | killexams.com real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

COMPUTINGFrom...Network World Fusion networking

January 24, 2000Web posted at: 12:eleven p.m. EST (1711 GMT)

by way of John Bass and James Robinson, community World check Alliance

(IDG) -- it every boils down to what you are trying to find in a community working device (NOS).

Do you exigency it lanky and springy so you can installation it any means you please? possibly administration bells and management whistles are what you want so you can install a number of hundred servers. Or possibly you exigency an operating materiel it's extraordinary satisfactory so that you sleep relish a child at evening?

The respectable intelligence is that there is a NOS waiting only for you. After the rash of recent software revisions, they took an in-depth study four of the principal NOSes in the marketplace: Microsoft's home windows 2000 superior Server, Novell's NetWare 5.1, red Hat application's Linux 6.1 and The Santa Cruz Operation's (SCO) UnixWare 7.1.1. sun declined their invitation to post Solaris because the company says it live engaged on a brand novel version.

Microsoft's home windows 2000 edges out NetWare for the network World Blue Ribbon Award. home windows 2000 tops the container with its management interface, server monitoring tools, storage administration facilities and protection measures.

besides the fact that children, if it's performance you're after, no product got here near Novell's NetWare 5.1's numbers in their exhaustive file service and network benchmarks. With its lightning-quickly engine and Novell's listing-primarily based administration, NetWare offers a fine foundation for an enterprise community.

We discovered the newest unlock of pink Hat's commercial Linux bundle led the listing for flexibility as a result of its modular design means that you can pare down the operating materiel to swimsuit the task at hand. additionally, you could create scripts out of dissimilar Linux commands to automate projects across a distributed ambiance.

whereas SCO's UnixWare gave the stamp to lag behind the pack in terms of file provider performance and NOS-based mostly administration aspects, its scalability facets manufacture it a powerful candidate for working business purposes.

The numbers are in

in spite of the job you saddle your server with, it has to perform neatly at reading and writing files and sending them throughout the community. They designed two benchmark suites to measure each NOS in these two classes. To mirror the actual world, their benchmark checks correspond with a substantial purview of server circumstances.

NetWare become the fingers-down chief in their efficiency benchmarking, taking first location in two-thirds of the file tests and earning top billing in the community tests.

crimson Hat Linux adopted NetWare in file performance overall and even outpaced the leader in file checks where the examine/write hundreds abide been small. besides the fact that children, Linux didn't office well handling colossal hundreds - those assessments through which there abide been more than a hundred users. below heavier person hundreds, Linux had a bent to cease servicing file requests for a short era after which birth up once again.

windows 2000 verified negative write efficiency across every their file tests. in fact, they discovered that its write efficiency turned into about 10% of its read performance. After consulting with each Microsoft and client/Server solutions, the writer of the Benchmark factory trying out device they used, they decided that the impoverished write efficiency could live because of two components. One, which they abide been unable to investigate, may live a likely performance issue with the SCSI driver for the hardware they used.

more large, notwithstanding, became an issue with their verify software. Benchmark manufacturing facility sends a write-through flag in every of its write requests that is meant to understanding the server to supplant cache, if applicable, and then drive a write to disk. When the write to disk occurs, the write title is released and the subsequent request may too live despatched.

in the genesis look, it regarded as if windows 2000 was the best operating materiel to reverence this write-through flag as a result of its write efficiency turned into so negative. for this reason, they ran a second round of write assessments with the flag became off.

With the flag grew to become off, NetWare's write efficiency extended by 30%. This examine proved that Novell does certainly reverence the write-via flag and should write to disk for each and every write request when that flag is set. however when the write-via flag is disabled, NetWare writes to disk in a more efficient fashion by batching collectively contiguous blocks of information on the cache and writing every these blocks to disk at once.

Likewise, purple Hat Linux's performance improved via 10% to fifteen% when the write-via flag was became off. when they examined the Samba file device code, they found that it too honors the write-through flag. The Samba code then finds an most efficient time every over the examine/write sequence to redeem in writing to disk.

This second circular of file testing proves that windows 2000 is stylish on its file gadget cache to optimize write performance. The results of the checking out with the write-via flag off were a magnificient deal higher - as a whole lot as 20 times faster. despite the fact, windows 2000 nevertheless fell at the back of both NetWare and RedHat Linux within the file write checks when the write-via flag become off.

SCO honors the write-via flag with the aid of default, given that its journaling file device is built to maximise statistics integrity by writing to disk for every write requests. The outcomes in the write assessments with the write-via flag on abide been very similar to the verify results with the write-via flag turned off.

For the community benchmark, they developed two assessments. Their lengthy TCP transaction verify measured the bandwidth each server can preserve, while their short TCP transaction view at various measured each server's skill to deal with colossal numbers of community periods with small file transactions.

despite a impoverished showing in the file benchmark, windows 2000 came out on top in the lengthy TCP transaction verify. windows 2000 is the simplest NOS with a multithreaded IP stack, which enables it to deal with community requests with multiple processors. Novell and purple Hat inform they're working on integrating this capability into their items.

NetWare and Linux additionally registered potent long TCP check effects, coming in second and third, respectively.

in the short TCP transaction examine, NetWare got here out the transparent winner. Linux earned second plot inspite of its exigency of assist for abortive TCP closes, a technique wherein an working system can promptly tear down TCP connections. Their trying out application, Ganymede utility's Chariot, uses abortive closes in its TCP assessments.

stepping into administration

As business networks grow to require greater servers and usher greater cease clients, NOS administration materiel become vital aspects in preserving networks below handle. They appeared at the administration interfaces of every product and drilled down into how each dealt with server monitoring, customer administration, file and print management, and storage administration.

We found windows 2000 and NetWare deliver equally useful management interfaces.

Microsoft management Console (MMC) is the glue that holds many of the windows 2000 management functionality collectively. This configurable graphical person interface (GUI) permits you to snap in Microsoft and third-celebration applets that customize its performance. it live a two-paned interface, lots relish home windows Explorer, with a nested listing on the left and preference details on the appropriate. The console is effortless to manufacture utilize of and allows you to configure many autochthonous server elements, together with users, disks, and device settings akin to time and date.

MMC additionally allows you to invoke management guidelines for businesses of clients and computer systems the usage of vigorous directory, Microsoft's novel listing service. From the lively listing administration tool internal MMC, that you could configure clients and change guidelines.

The community configuration materiel are present in a separate utility that opens for those who click on on the community places icon on the computer. each and every community interface is listed inside this window. that you may add and alter protocols and configure, enable and disable interfaces from here without rebooting.

NetWare offers a number of interfaces for server configuration and management. These materiel present duplicate functionality, however each is valuable based from where you try to control the gadget. The gadget Console presents a number of tools for server configuration. probably the most positive is NWConfig, which permits you to exchange beginning-up files, install system modules and configure the storage subsystem. NWConfig is fundamental, intuitive and predictable.

ConsoleOne is a Java-based interface with just a few graphical materiel for managing and configuring NetWare. Third-birthday celebration administration tools can plug into ConsoleOne and let you manage varied features. They believe ConsoleOne's interface is a minute unsophisticated, nevertheless it works smartly sufficient for those that should abide a home windows- primarily based supervisor.

Novell too presents a web-available management software known as NetWare administration Portal, which allows you to maneuver NetWare servers remotely from a browser, and NWAdmin32, a relatively fundamental client-aspect device for administering Novell listing functions (NDS) from a windows 95, 98 or NT customer.

purple Hat's usual methods management interface is called LinuxConf and might urge as a graphical or textual content-based software. The graphical interface, which resembles that of MMC, works neatly but has some layout issues that manufacture it tricky to utilize every now and then. as an instance, if you happen to urge a setup utility that takes up a lot of the reveal, the materiel resizes the software bigger than the computing device size.

nonetheless, you can maneuver pretty a lot the rest on the server from LinuxConf, and you can utilize it in the neighborhood or remotely over the internet or by means of telnet. you can configure device parameters reminiscent of community addresses; file device settings and consumer accounts; and install add-on capabilities such as Samba - which is a provider that lets windows valued clientele rep to information residing on a Linux server - and FTP and net servers. which you can drill alterations without rebooting the gadget.

universal, crimson Hat's interface is useful and the underlying materiel are powerful and versatile, but LinuxConf lacks the polish of the different vendors' equipment.

SCO Admin is a GUI-based mostly entrance cease for approximately 50 SCO UnixWare configuration and administration tools in a single window. if you click on on a device, it brings up the application to manage that item in a separate window.

a few of SCO's materiel are GUI-primarily based whereas others are text-based. The server required a reboot to apply many of the changes. On the plus side, which you could control several UnixWare servers from SCOAdmin.

SCO too offers a constructive Java-primarily based far off administration tool referred to as WebTop that works out of your browser.

an eye fixed on the servers and valued clientele

One crucial administration project is monitoring the server itself. Microsoft leads the pack in how neatly which you can preserve an eye fixed to your server's internals.

The home windows 2000 materiel computer screen lets you view a real-time, running graph of device operations, similar to CPU and network utilization, and reminiscence and disk utilization. They used these tools extensively to assess the outcome of their benchmark checks on the working gadget. an extra device known as community computer screen has a primary community packet analyzer that lets you discern the kinds of packets coming into the server. collectively, these Microsoft utilities may too live used to examine performance and skill throughout assorted home windows 2000 servers.

NetWare's video array utility displays processor utilization, reminiscence usage and buffer utilization on a autochthonous server. if you recognize what to search for, it will too live an impressive device for diagnosing bottlenecks within the equipment. researching the which means of each and every of the monitored parameters is quite of a challenge, though.

if you exigency to resolve performance statistics throughout diverse servers, you could tap into Novell's internet administration Portal.

pink Hat presents the mediocre Linux command-line tools for monitoring the server, akin to iostat and vmstat. It has no graphical monitoring tools.

as with any Unix working device, that you can write scripts to automate these tools across Linux servers. however, these tools are customarily cryptic and require a tall stage of proficiency to manufacture utilize of quite simply. a suite of graphical monitoring materiel can live an excellent addition to crimson Hat's Linux distribution.

UnixWare additionally offers a few monitoring tools. gadget array screen is UnixWare's primary but constrained GUI for monitoring processor and reminiscence utilization. The sar and rtpm command-line tools together listing precise-time gadget utilization of buffer, CPUs and disks. together, these tools give you a very magnificient mediocre conception of the cross on the server.

client administration

along with managing the server, you should manage its clients. or not it's no shock that the two NOSes that ship with an built-in directory service topped the territory in client administration tools.

We were capable of configure person permissions by the utilize of Microsoft's lively directory and the directory administration tool in MMC. that you could community users and computer systems into organizational units and celebrate policies to them.

you can maneuver Novell's NDS and NetWare valued clientele with ConsoleOne, NWAdmin or NetWare administration Portal. every can create clients, control file area, and set permissions and rights. additionally, NetWare ships with a 5-consumer version of Novell's ZENworks device, which presents computing device administration features equivalent to hardware and utility inventory, application distribution and far off wield features.

purple Hat Linux does not present lots in the fashion of customer administration elements. You abide to wield local clients through Unix license configuration mechanisms.

UnixWare is comparable to purple Hat Linux in terms of client administration, but SCO gives some windows binaries on the server to remotely set file and directory permissions from a windows client, in addition to create and alter users and their settings. SCO and crimson Hat present assist for the Unix-based mostly network recommendation carrier (NIS). NIS is a redeem for community recommendation relish logon names, passwords and residential directories. This integration helps with client administration.

dealing with the staples: File and print

A NOS is nothing with out the skill to share file storage and printers. Novell and Microsoft accumulated excellent honors in these areas.

that you can readily add and maintain printers in home windows 2000 the utilize of the print administration wizard, and you can add file shares the usage of vigorous directory management tools. windows 2000 too offers disbursed File capabilities, which import you can fuse info on multiple server into a single share.

Novell distributed Print functions (NDPS) can abet you right now comprise printers into the network. When NDPS senses a brand novel printer on the community, it defines a Printer Agent that runs on the printer and communicates with NDS. then you definitely utilize NDS to contour the guidelines for the novel printer.

You define NetWare file functions with the aid of creating after which mounting a disk extent, which too manages quantity policies.

purple Hat contains Linux's printtool utility for setting up server-linked and networks printers. which you could too utilize this GUI to create printcap entries to define printer access.

Linux has a set of command-line file materiel configuration materiel for mounting and unmounting partitions. Samba ships with the product and provides some integration for windows customers. that you can configure Samba only through a cryptic configuration ASCII file - a serious disadvantage.

UnixWare gives a versatile GUI-primarily based printer setup tool called Printer SetUp manager. For file and extent administration, SCO offers a device called VisionFS for interoperability with windows shoppers. They used VisionFS to permit their NT consumers to access the UnixWare server. This service turned into convenient to configure and use.

Storage administration

windows 2000 offers the most useful tools for storage administration. Its graphical control Disks tool for autochthonous disk configuration comprises software RAID administration; that you would live able to dynamically add disks to a volume set while not having to reboot the system. moreover, a signature is written to every of the disks in an array in order that they can live moved to an additional 2000 server without having to configure the extent on the novel server. the brand novel server recognizes the drives as participants of a RAID set and adds the extent to the file materiel dynamically.

NetWare's extent management device, NWConfig, is effortless to manufacture utilize of, but it will too live a minute confusing to install a RAID volume. once they knew what they abide been doing, they had no problems formatting drives and creating a RAID quantity. The device appears a minute primitive, however they provide it exorbitant marks for performance and ease of use.

red Hat Linux offers no graphical RAID configuration equipment, but its command line materiel made RAID configuration convenient.

To configure disks on the UnixWare server, they used the Veritas extent manager graphical disk and quantity administration tool that ships with UnixWare. They had some complications at first getting the device to recognize the drives so that they may well live formatted. They managed to work across the disk configuration hardship using an assortment of command line tools, after which quantity manager worked well.

safety

whereas they didn't probe these NOSes extensively to clarify any protection weaknesses, they did view at what they offered in protection aspects.

Microsoft has made tremendous strides with home windows 2000 protection. windows 2000 helps Kerberos public key certificates as its basic authentication mechanism inside a domain, and allows for further authentication with wise playing cards. Microsoft provides a safety Configuration device that integrates with MMC for handy administration of protection objects in the vigorous directory features gadget, and a novel Encrypting File materiel that allows you to designate volumes on which files are immediately saved the utilize of encryption.

Novell added usher for a public-key infrastructure into NetWare 5 the usage of a public certificate schema developed via RSA security that lets you tap into NDS to generate certificates.

pink Hat offers a fundamental Kerberos authentication mechanism. With crimson Hat Linux, as with most Unix working techniques, the network functions can live in my view managed to raise protection. purple Hat presents Pluggable Authentication Modules as a way of permitting you to set authentication guidelines across courses running on the server. Passwords are covered with a shadow file. pink Hat too bundles firewall and VPN capabilities.

UnixWare has a collection of safety tools called protection supervisor that allows you to deploy various levels of intrusion insurance policy throughout your network capabilities, from no restriction to turning every community capabilities off. it's a fine administration time saver, although you could manually regulate the capabilities to achieve the same result.

stability and weakness tolerance

probably the most characteristic-wealthy NOS is of minute cost if it can't maintain a server up and operating. windows 2000 presents application RAID 0, 1 and 5 configurations to deliver weakness tolerance for onboard disk drives, and has a built-in network load-balancing characteristic that allows for a gaggle of servers to view relish one server and share the identical community title and IP address. The community decides which server will provider each and every request. This not most effective distributes the network load throughout several servers, it too gives weakness tolerance in case a server goes down. On a lesser scale, that you can utilize Microsoft's Failover Clustering to provide simple failover features between two servers.

As with NT four.0, windows 2000 provides reminiscence insurance policy, which capacity that each and every process runs in its own phase.

There are too backup and fix capabilities bundled with windows 2000.

Novell has an add-on product for NetWare known as Novell Cluster features that permits you to cluster as many as eight servers, every managed from one belt using ConsoleOne, NetWare administration Portal or NWAdmin32. however Novell right now presents no clustering products to supply load balancing for functions or file services. NetWare has an problematic reminiscence insurance policy scheme to segregate the reminiscence used for the kernel and applications, and a Storage administration features module to supply a totally springy backup and fix facility. Backups can too live all-inclusive, cowl constituents of a quantity or shop a differential photo.

purple Hat provides a load-balancing product referred to as piranha with its Linux. This package offers TCP load balancing between servers in a cluster. There is no difficult circumscribe to the variety of servers that you can configure in a cluster. crimson Hat Linux too provides software RAID assist via command line tools, has reminiscence coverage capabilities and provides a rudimentary backup facility.

SCO offers an not obligatory characteristic to cluster a number of servers in a load-balancing atmosphere with non-stop Clustering for a exorbitant stage of fault-tolerance. presently, non-stop Clustering supports six servers in a cluster. UnixWare provides utility RAID abet that is managed the usage of SCO's online information supervisor characteristic. the entire commonplace RAID degrees are supported. desktop pals' bundled ArcServeIT 6.6 provides backup and restore capabilities. UnixWare has reminiscence insurance plot capabilities.

Documentation

as a result of their checking out become conducted earlier than windows 2000's established availability ship date, they abide been now not able to reckon its challenging-copy documentation. The on-line documentation offered on a CD is wide, advantageous and neatly-geared up, despite the fact a web interface could live an Awful lot simpler to utilize if it gave more than a brace of sentences at a time for a particular support theme.

NetWare 5 comes with two manuals: a detailed manual for setting up and configuring the NOS with respectable explanations of ideas and contours along with an overview of a way to configure them, and a small spiral-sure booklet of quick delivery playing cards. Novell's online documentation is very valuable.

red Hat Linux comes with three manuals - an installing book, a getting begun engage and a reference usher - every of which can live effortless to comply with.

regardless of being probably the most intricate product to set up, UnixWare offers the optimal documentation. It comes with two manuals: a device handbook and a getting begun e-book. The gadget usher is a reference for conducting the setting up of the operating device. It does a very magnificient job of reflecting this painful adventure. The getting begun e-book is smartly-written and well-prepared. It covers lots of the materiel necessary to configure and maintain the operating gadget. SCO's online documentation appears first-rate and is effortless to observe.

Wrapping up

The final analysis is that these NOSes present a wide purview of traits and supply business purchasers with an excellent deal of option regarding how each and every can live utilized in any given company community.

if you want a good, everyday goal NOS that can carry business-classification capabilities with every of the bells and whistles possible, then windows 2000 is the strongest contender. youngsters, for prime efficiency, business file and print services, their checks demonstrate that Novell leads the pack. when you are inclined to pay an improved rate for scalability and reliability, SCO UnixWare could live a safe bet. but when you want a reasonable alternative for you to give you bare-bones community services with first rate performance, pink Hat Linux can actually sound the bill.

The option is yours.

Bass is the technical director and Robinson is a senior technical staff member at Centennial Networking Labs (CNL) at North Carolina State university in Raleigh. CNL makes a speciality of efficiency, capacity and contours of networking and server technologies and machine.

related reviews:

Debate will headquarters of attention on Linux vs. LinuxJanuary 20, 2000Some home windows 2000 PCs will start the gunJanuary 19, 2000IBM throws Linux lovefestJanuary 19, 2000Corel Linux will urge home windows appsJanuary 10, 2000Novell's eDirectory spans platformsNovember 16, 1999New NetWare embraces internet appsNovember 2, 1999Microsoft sets a date for windows 2000October 28, 1999

linked IDG.web studies:

Fusion's forum: rectangular off with the vendors over who has the premiere NOS(community World Fusion)How they did it: particulars of the testing(community World Fusion)find out the tuning parameters(community World Fusion)download the Config data(community World Fusion)The Shootout consequences(network World Fusion)Fusion's NOS substances(network World Fusion)With windows 2000, NT grows up(community World Fusion)Fireworks anticipated at NOS showdown(network World Fusion)

be aware: Pages will open in a novel browser window

exterior websites are not counseled with the aid of CNN Interactive. linked sites:

Novell, Inc.Microsoft Corp.The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. (SCO)crimson Hat, Inc.

notice: Pages will open in a brand novel browser window

external sites aren't counseled by using CNN Interactive.

SUSE Linux commercial enterprise Server eleven provider Pack 1 Slated for Q2 2010 | killexams.com real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

enterprise utility significant Novell has redeem a date on the liberate of the first service pack for its SUSE Linux business Server 11 (SLES). the primary principal supplant on the grounds that its launch a yr ago does not deliver any substantial novel features and focuses on bug fixes and steadiness. SUSE Linux enterprise Server 11 provider Pack 1 is slated for free up on the cease of the 2nd quarter. still, it is going to comprise a relatively modern Linux kernel, 2.6.32 with abet for kernel-primarily based mode surroundings (KMS). It too provides professional support for the KVM virtualization scheme, which is being spearheaded with the aid of rival crimson Hat.

The timeline for SLES 11 service Pack 1 was disclosed in the SLES know-how roadmap presentation scheduled for this year's Novell BrainShare developers convention on can too 18.

As referred to, SLES eleven carrier Pack 1 will arrive with Linux kernel 2.6.32 which, amongst different elements, has usher for KMS. This changed into introduced by way of the kernel developers to provide usher for extra advanced functionality in future photo card drivers. Novell says this become a piece of the understanding behind the upgrade to 2.6.32, from Linux kernel 2.6.27, and it permits SUSE commercial enterprise Linux eleven to live ready for anything photos card carriers abide in save.

SLES 11 carrier Pack 1 has awesome hardware abet as neatly. From the novel presentation:

· exploit most recent hardware by means of scaling as much as 4096 CPUs on AMD64/Intel64;

· Compute huge amounts of data in memory, e.g. in facts- warehouse and ERP programs, by using supporting 16TiB RAM (and past) on certified hardware;

· enhance inter-gadget connectivity and efficiency, reduce latency through enabling 10G ethernet hardware and Infiniband by way of the Open fabrics enterprise Distribution (OFED).

Virtualization in SLES eleven gets some enhancements in service Pack 1, to live anticipated given what number of agencies utilize the characteristic. provider Pack 1 will rep professional aid for KVM, which is too slated to develop into the preferred virtualization formula in SUSE Linux business. SLES eleven has relied on Xen for its virtualization capabilities and it continues to live the default alternative. Xen has too been updated to 4.0.


Novellus Brings opportunities For Longs And Shorts In post-income trade | killexams.com real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No result found, are attempting novel key phrase!On July 12, 2010, NVLS advanced 1.7% in after-hours trading after beating Q2 ... And, on July 12, 2004, NVLS misplaced 5.1% in premarket change after the business beat expectations. It narrowed its draw back ...

050-854 cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration

Study usher Prepared by Killexams.com Novell Dumps Experts


Killexams.com 050-854 Dumps and real Questions

100% real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with tall Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



050-854 exam Dumps Source : cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration

Test Code : 050-854
Test title : cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration
Vendor title : Novell
: 192 real Questions

right information and abide a view at with the 050-854 and Dumps! What a aggregate!
The snappy solutions made my coaching greater handy. I finished seventy five questions out off 80 properly beneaththe stipulated time and managed 80%. My aspiration to live an authorized purchase the exam 050-854. I were given the killexams.Com usher definitely 2 weeks in forward than the examination. Thank you.


050-854 certification examination is quite traumatic without this celebrate guide.
With most effective two weeks to stagger for my 050-854 examination, I felt so helpless considering my terrible coaching. But, needed to bypass the test badly as I desired to exchange my job. Finally, I located the question and solution by using killexams.Com which removed my issues. The content of the manual changed into moneyed and specific. The simple and short answers helped manufacture out the subjects effortlessly. magnificient manual, killexams. too took assist from 050-854 Official Cert usher and it helped.


No waste latest time on searhching net! determined precise source cutting-edge 050-854 .
I took this exam last month and passed it thanks to my preparation with the killexams.com kit. This is a magnificient exam dump, more trustworthy than I could expect. every questions are valid, and it too includes plenty of preparation info. Better and more trustworthy than I expected - I passed with over 97%, which is the best 050-854 exam score. I dont know why so few IT people know about killexams.com, or maybe its just my conservative environment Anyways, I will live spreading the word among my friends since this is magnificient and will live helpful to many.


start making ready those 050-854 questions answers and chillout.
Killexams.Com has pinnacle merchandise for college students because the ones are designed for those college students who are inquisitive about the education of 050-854 certification. It turn out to live remarkable selection due to the reality 050-854 examination engine has magnificient study contents which may live immaculate to apprehend in quick time period. I am thankful to the superb group because this helped me in my profession development. It helped me to understand the manner to solution every crucial inquiries to rep most ratings. It become outstanding selection that made me fan of killexams. Ive decided to arrive back lower back back one greater time.


Little effor required to prepare 050-854 real question bank.
Im inspired to view the feedback that 050-854 braindump is up to date. The modifications are very novel and that i did no longer anticipate to learn them everywhere. I just took my first 050-854 examination so this one can live the following step. Gonna order soon.


getting ready 050-854 examination is rely modern day some hours now.
My pals instructed me I could anticipate killexams.com for 050-854 examination preparation, and this time I did. The wit dumps are very handy to apply, i relish how they may live set up. The query order facilitates you memorize things higher. I passed with 89% marks.


What study usher finish I exigency to prepare to pass 050-854 exam?
I ought to recognize that your answers and reasons to the questions are very good. These helped me understand the basics and thereby helped me try the questions which abide been now not direct. I may want to abide handed without your question bank, but your question fiscal institution and closing day revision set abide been truely helpful. I had expected a score of ninety+, but despite the fact that scored 83.50%. Thank you.


Just try these real exam questions and success is yours.
We every know that clearing the 050-854 test is a substantial deal. I got my 050-854 test cleared that I was so content just due to killexams.com that gave me 87% marks.


I found a very magnificient source of 050-854 material.
Your question bank is exigency of the hour. I abide got 89.1% in the 050-854 exam. Very magnificient wishes for your experts. Thank you Team. so delighted to transparent this exam. Your study material was extremely useful, clear, consise, covering entire material and suberb stacking of questions to manufacture one strong preparation. Thanks again to you and your team.


found maximum 050-854 Questions in real exam that I prepared.
Asking my father to abet me with some thing is relish getting into in to huge hassle and i without a doubt didnt exigency to disturb him throughout my 050-854 coaching. I knew a person else has to abet me. I just didnt who itd live until certainly one of my cousins advised me of this Killexams.com. It become relish a extraordinary gift to me because it become extremely usefuland useful for my 050-854 check instruction. I owe my high-quality marks to the people running on here due to the fact their dedication made it viable.


Whilst it is very difficult task to select trustworthy exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people rep ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com manufacture it unavoidable to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients arrive to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is principal to every of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you discern any bogus report posted by their competitor with the title killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something relish this, just preserve in wit that there are always contemptible people damaging reputation of magnificient services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams drill questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu



050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854

Exactly same 050-854 questions as in real test, WTF!
killexams.com is a definitive planning hotspot for passing the Novell 050-854 exam. They abide deliberately gone along and amassed real exam questions and answers, which are refreshed with indistinguishable recurrence from real exam is refreshed, and assessed by industry specialists. Tremendous Discount Coupon and Promo codes are offered for extraordinary discount.

If you are examining out killexams.com Novell 050-854 Dumps containing real exam Questions and Answers for the cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration test preparation, they abide an approach to provide most updated and quality database of 050-854 Dumps that's http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/050-854. they abide aggregated an information of 050-854 Dumps questions from 050-854 real test questions with a selected finish goal to relinquish you an occasion to induce prepared and pass 050-854 exam on the first attempt. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders If you are interested in properly Passing the Novell 050-854 exam to start earning big? killexams.com has leading aspect evolved cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration test questions with the end to manufacture sure you pass the 050-854 exam. killexams.com will present you the foremost correct, up to date and progressive 050-854 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several companies that present 050-854 brain dumps but those are not amend and recent ones. Preparation with killexams.com 050-854 novel questions will live a nice manner to pass this certification test in swish manner. We are every properly aware that a main concern within the IT business is there will live an absence of superior braindumps. Their test drill dumps provides you the whole thing you will exigency to require a certification test. Their Novell 050-854 exam offers you with test questions with confirmed solutions that replicate the principal test. These Questions and Answers provide you with the relish of taking the particular exam. High-quality and low cost for the 050-854 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your Novell 050-854 exam and acquire your Novell certification. they are committed to assist you pass your 050-854 exam with tall scores. the probabilities of you failing your 050-854 exam, once memorizing their complete test dumps are little.

killexams.com helps a magnificient many applicants pass the exams and rep their certifications. They abide a huge number of effective surveys. Their dumps are solid, reasonable, updated and of truly best quality to conquer the troubles of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are most recent updated in exceedingly outflank way on customary premise and material is discharged intermittently. Most recent killexams.com dumps are accessible in testing focuses with whom they are keeping up their relationship to rep most recent material.

The killexams.com exam questions for 050-854 cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration exam is basically in view of two available arrangements, PDF and drill software. PDF record conveys every the exam questions, answers which makes your planning less hardworking. While the drill software are the complimentary factor in the exam item. Which serves to self-survey your advance. The assessment apparatus additionally features your feeble regions, where you abide to redeem more attempt with the goal that you can enhance every one of your worries.

killexams.com suggest you to must attempt its free demo, you will discern the natural UI and furthermore you will Think that its simple to alter the prep mode. In any case, ensure that, the real 050-854 exam has a larger number of questions than the sample exam. On the off casual that, you are placated with its demo then you can buy the real 050-854 exam item. killexams.com offers you three months free updates of 050-854 cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration exam questions. Their certification team is constantly accessible at back cease who updates the material as and when required.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders


050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854 | 050-854



Exam Simulator : Pass4sure 050-854 Exam Simulator

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps



cni-netware 5.1 advanced administration

Pass 4 sure 050-854 dumps | Killexams.com 050-854 real questions | http://www.radionaves.com/

The Feds’ Termination Of A Tiny compress Inflames acerbic Fight Over Fetal Tissue | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Federal health officials announced late last month they had terminated their compress with a company that supplies human fetal tissue for medical research and were checking that similar contracts, as well as studies conducted with that tissue, comply with federal law.

The seemingly innocuous release about a tiny government contract, which came out as Americans focused on umpire Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, belied the substantial stakes and contentious issue behind it. Government officials are considering pulling federal funding for a decades-old configuration of research that has yielded a number of medical advances, including the polio vaccine.

The Department of Health and Human Services has faced mounting pressure from conservative lawmakers and abortion opponents, who strongly supported President Donald Trump’s candidacy, to halt the utilize of tissue obtained from aborted fetuses.

“The federal government must find ethical alternatives as soon as possible, and should cease every association with those who participate in any trafficking or procurement of aborted baby organs,” 45 leaders from groups, including Susan B. Anthony List and the Family Research Council, wrote in a recent letter to HHS.

But a letter to congressional leaders, signed by 64 medical and scientific institutions including the American Academy of Pediatrics and Johns Hopkins University, said interfering in fetal tissue research would live “devastating.” The letter cited its impact in understanding viruses relish Zika and HIV, as well as ongoing clinical trials to find treatments for spinal cord injuries.

“Fetal tissue research has been censorious for scientific and medical advances that abide saved the lives of millions of people,” they wrote.

Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

The supplier whose compress was terminated, a California-based company called Advanced Bioscience Resources, came under fire in 2015 when it was identified in videos that surreptitiously captured Planned Parenthood officials discussing how fetal tissue is provided to researchers.

The videos were piece of a controversial sting operation by activists who alleged Planned Parenthood was unlawfully profiting from the sale of fetal tissue, including to Advanced Bioscience Resources. Planned Parenthood officials condemned the videos, which they said were deceptively edited. After its own investigation, a Texas magnificient jury declined to indict anyone from Planned Parenthood, instead indicting two of the activists responsible for the videos.

HHS vowed to view into the research “in light of the serious regulatory, moral, and ethical considerations.”

The announcement too comes weeks before Election Day, giving Republicans an occasion to employ a potent talking point — their rigid opposition to Planned Parenthood — as they urge their supporters to vote.

Here’s what you exigency to know to understand the debate.

Where does fetal tissue arrive from, and how is it used in research?

Tissue from human fetuses is frequently used to manufacture cell cultures, which allow researchers to examine biological processes in a laboratory setting.

The tissue comes from elective abortions, with the written consent of the woman donating the tissue. Health facilities where the abortion occurred may provide it directly to researchers or transfer it to a supplier, such as Advanced Bioscience Resources.

It is unclear how many suppliers there are. A 2015 report from the Congressional Research Service identified just a few known suppliers, citing a novel York Times anecdote that said many researchers proceed to just two companies: Advanced Bioscience Resources and another California-based company called StemExpress.

Researchers abide used fetal tissue to study genetic diseases and development disorders relish Down syndrome, as well as to test the toxicity of medications taken by pregnant women and the efficacy of vaccines. The measles vaccine, for example, was developed with the abet of fetal tissue.

Fetal tissue too has been transplanted into patients in attempts to treat various disorders, injuries and illnesses, including Parkinson’s disease.

Why is HHS reviewing compliance with federal law? Isn’t this research legal?

It is legal to conduct research using fetal tissue, subject to laws and regulations addressing issues such as consent from the woman undergoing the abortion. Researchers in the United States abide used fetal tissue since the 1930s, and the federal government has funded such research since the 1950s, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Things rep thorny when it comes to acquiring the tissue. A 1993 law made it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce.” In other words, you can neither sell nor purchase fetal tissue in the United States.

But the ban comes with a caveat: Companies that supply researchers with fetal tissue can pervade to cover their costs for things relish storage, preservation and transportation.

Republican lawmakers and abortion opponents abide accused Advanced Bioscience Resources, as well as StemExpress and another supplier that has since gone out of business, of inflating their costs to turn a profit.

After the release of the sting videos in 2015, House and Senate Republicans launched lengthy investigations into fetal tissue acquisition and research, culminating in a pair of reports that accused the suppliers, Planned Parenthood and a handful of its affiliates of illegal sales and purchases.

In late 2016, Republican lawmakers asked the Justice Department to investigate the matter, and several intelligence outlets reported last December that it appeared to live doing so. (The Justice Department typically does not validate the being of ongoing investigations.)

So, why is HHS doing this now?

In August, the conservative intelligence outlet CNSNews.com reported the Food and Drug Administration had signed a one-year, nearly $16,000 compress with Advanced Bioscience Resources to acquire fetal tissue for transplantation in mice in federal research labs.

It was not the government’s first compress with the supplier. Records clarify the FDA contracted with Advanced Bioscience Resources in 2015 and 2016.

In September, 85 House Republicans sent a letter to Scott Gottlieb, the head of the FDA, noting that lawmakers had found evidence the supplier may abide violated federal law during their investigations.

“We urge you to cancel this compress immediately and utilize alternative, modern scientific techniques that finish not contribute to the trafficking in baby cadaver parts,” the lawmakers wrote. 

Has fetal tissue research been an issue in the past?

Yes. In 1988, in fact, HHS banned funding for research on fetal tissue transplantation while an advisory panel reviewed the issue. While divided in their views on abortion, most panel members supported the conclusion that, since abortion was legal and the research could yield significant medical discoveries, this research was “acceptable public policy.”

The George H.W. Bush administration rejected the panel’s conclusion, concerned the research would create incentives for women to abide abortions, and the ban stood until President Bill Clinton eliminated it in 1993, shortly after being sworn in.

Democrats in Congress seized on the safeguards recommended by the panel and soon passed the 1993 law that, among other things, banned the sale and purchase of fetal tissue.

A similar fight over stem cells erupted in 2001, when President George W. Bush severely restricted research on embryonic stem cells, which are taken from human embryos donated by couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. President Barack Obama later lifted the restrictions.

KHN’s coverage of women’s health care issues is supported in piece by The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

Emmarie Huetteman: ehuetteman@kff.org, @emmarieDC

Related Topics Health Industry Abortion FDA HHS Trump Administration Women's Health

Intelligent Apps Market by Type, Provider, Store Type, Deployment Mode, Service, Vertical, and Region - Global Forecast to 2023 | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

No result found, try novel keyword!APAC is to live the fastest-growing region in the global knowing apps market, owing to the increasing adoption of advanced technologies across the ... Scenario 5 Market Overview and Industry Trends ...

The PNC fiscal Services Group Inc.: PNC Reports Third Quarter 2018 Net Income Of $1.4 Billion, $2.82 Diluted EPS | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

PITTSBURGH, Oct. 12, 2018/PRNewswire / -- The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: PNC) today reported: 'PNC delivered another good, consistent quarter. They grew mediocre loans and deposits and continued to add novel clients. Net interest income and their margin and fee income increased. We're experiencing success with their national initiative to expand their middle market capabilities in faster growing markets, and they launched their national retail digital strategy with a tall yield savings present to live supported by an ultra-thin retail network. Looking ahead, we're positioned to drive growth and efficiency over the long term.' Bill Demchak, PNC Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Income Statement Highlights Third quarter 2018 compared with second quarter 2018
  • Net income of $1.4 billionfor the third quarter increased $44 million, or 3 percent, compared with the second quarter.
  • Total revenue for the third quarter increased $33 million, or 1 percent, to $4.4 billion.
  • Net interest income increased $53 million, or 2 percent, to $2.5 billiondue to higher loan yields and securities balances and the profit of an additional day in the third quarter partially offset by increased funding costs.
  • Net interest margin increased 3 basis points to 2.99 percent.
  • Noninterest income was $1.9 billion, a diminish of $20 million.
  • Fee income grew $13 million, or 1 percent, to $1.6 billionled by higher asset management revenue and consumer activity.
  • Other noninterest income decreased $33 millionto $301 millionprimarily due to negative Visa Class B derivative unprejudiced value adjustments of $32 millionin the third quarter compared with a profit of $27 millionin the second quarter partially offset by higher revenue from private equity investments.
  • Noninterest expense increased $24 million, or 1 percent, to $2.6 billiondriven by higher business activity.
  • Provision for credit losses was $88 million, an enlarge of $8 millionreflecting a higher provision for consumer loans.
  • The effective tax rate was 15.7 percent for the third quarter compared with 18.3 percent for the second quarter due to the timing of deductions related to tax planning activities.
  • Balance Sheet Highlights
  • Average loans increased $.7 billionin the third quarter to $223.3 billioncompared with the second quarter.
  • Average commercial lending balances grew $.2 billionprimarily in PNC's materiel finance and business credit businesses. Loan growth was moderated by substantial payoff volumes.
  • Average consumer lending balances increased $.5 billiondue to growth in auto, residential mortgage, credit card and unsecured installment loans partially offset by lower home equity and education loans.
  • Overall credit quality remained strong.
  • Nonperforming assets of $1.8 billionat September 30, 2018decreased $29 million, or 2 percent, compared with June 30, 2018.
  • Net charge-offs were $91 millionfor the third quarter compared with $109 millionfor the second quarter.
  • Average deposits increased $1.5 billion, or 1 percent, to $262.5 billionin the third quarter compared with the second quarter primarily due to seasonal growth in commercial deposits.
  • Average investment securities increased $3.3 billion, or 4 percent, to $80.8 billionin the third quarter compared with the second quarter.
  • PNC returned $.9 billionof capital to shareholders in the third quarter through repurchases of 3.3 million common shares for $.5 billionand dividends on common shares of $.4 billion.
  • The August quarterly cash dividend on common stock was raised to 95 centsper share, an enlarge of 20 centsper share, or 27 percent.
  • PNC maintained strong capital and liquidity positions.
  • The Basel III common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was an estimated 9.3 percent at September 30, 2018and 9.5 percent at June 30, 2018.
  • The Liquidity Coverage Ratio at September 30, 2018for both PNC and PNC Bank, N.A. continued to exceed the regulatory minimum requirement of 100 percent.
  • Earnings Summary In millions, except per share data 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 Net income $ 1,400 $ 1,356 $ 1,126 Net income attributable to diluted common shares $ 1,317 $ 1,282 $ 1,042 Diluted earnings per common share $ 2.82 $ 2.72 $ 2.16 Average diluted common shares outstanding 467 472 483 Return on mediocre assets 1.47 % 1.45 % 1.20 % Return on mediocre common equity 12.32 % 12.13 % 9.89 % Book value per common share Quarter end $ 93.22 $ 92.26 $ 89.05 Tangible engage value per common share (non-GAAP) Quarter end $ 73.11 $ 72.25 $ 69.72 Cash dividends declared per common share $ .95 $ .75 $ .75 The Consolidated fiscal Highlights accompanying this intelligence release comprise additional information regarding reconciliations of non-GAAP fiscal measures to reported amounts. Fee income, a non-GAAP fiscal measure, refers to noninterest income in the following categories: asset management, consumer services, corporate services, residential mortgage and service charges on deposits. Information in this intelligence release including the fiscal tables is unaudited. CONSOLIDATED REVENUE REVIEW Revenue Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Net interest income $ 2,466 $ 2,413 $ 2,345 2 % 5 % Noninterest income 1,891 1,911 1,780 (1) % 6 % Total revenue $ 4,357 $ 4,324 $ 4,125 1 % 6 % Total revenue for the third quarter of 2018 increased $33 millioncompared with the second quarter and $232 millioncompared with the third quarter of 2017. Net interest income grew in both comparisons and noninterest income increased over third quarter 2017. Net interest income for the third quarter of 2018 increased $53 millioncompared with the second quarter and $121 millioncompared with the third quarter of 2017. Higher loan and securities yields and balances were partially offset by higher deposit and borrowing costs in both comparisons reflecting the impact of interest rate increases. Third quarter 2018 too benefited from an additional day compared with the second quarter. The net interest margin increased to 2.99 percent for the third quarter of 2018 compared with 2.96 percent for the second quarter and 2.91 percent for the third quarter of 2017. Noninterest Income Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Asset management $ 486 $ 456 $ 421 7 % 15 % Consumer services 377 381 357 (1) % 6 % Corporate services 465 487 404 (5) % 15 % Residential mortgage 76 84 104 (10) % (27) % Service charges on deposits 186 169 181 10 % 3 % Other 301 334 313 (10) % (4) % $ 1,891 $ 1,911 $ 1,780 (1) % 6 % Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2018 declined $20 millioncompared with the second quarter as fee income growth was more than offset by a diminish in other noninterest income. Asset management revenue, including earnings from PNC's equity investment in BlackRock, grew $30 millionand reflected higher mediocre equity markets. Corporate service fees declined $22 millionprimarily due to a lower profit from commercial mortgage servicing rights valuation, net of economic hedge, and lower loan syndication fees partially offset by higher merger and acquisition advisory fees. Residential mortgage revenue decreased $8 millionattributable to a lower profit from mortgage servicing rights valuation, net of economic hedge. Service charges on deposits grew $17 millionreflecting a seasonal enlarge in consumer spending. Other noninterest income for the third quarter of 2018 decreased $33 millionprimarily due to negative derivative unprejudiced value adjustments of $32 millionrelated to Visa Class B common shares in the third quarter compared with a profit of $27 millionin the second quarter partially offset by higher revenue from private equity investments. Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2018 increased $111 millioncompared with the third quarter of 2017. Asset management revenue increased $65 millionand included the profit of the lower federal statutory income tax rate on BlackRock earnings and higher equity markets. Consumer service fees grew $20 milliondriven by increased customer activity reflected in debit card, brokerage and credit card fees. Corporate service fees grew $61 millionprimarily due to higher merger and acquisition advisory fees and treasury management revenue. Residential mortgage revenue decreased $28 millionas a result of lower loan sales and servicing revenue and a lower profit from mortgage servicing rights valuation, net of economic hedge. CONSOLIDATED EXPENSE REVIEW Noninterest Expense Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Personnel $ 1,413 $ 1,356 $ 1,286 4 % 10 % Occupancy 195 203 204 (4) % (4) % Equipment 264 281 259 (6) % 2 % Marketing 71 75 62 (5) % 15 % Other 665 669 645 (1) % 3 % $ 2,608 $ 2,584 $ 2,456 1 % 6 % Noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2018 increased $24 millioncompared with the second quarter. Personnel expense increased $57 millionprimarily due to higher variable compensation associated with increased business activity and an additional day in the third quarter. This enlarge was partially offset by declines in every other expense categories. Noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2018 increased $152 millioncompared with the third quarter of 2017. Ongoing business investments were primarily reflected in personnel expense, which increased $127 millionand included higher variable compensation related to revenue growth, increased staffing levels and enhanced retail banking compensation, as well as higher marketing expense supporting business growth. The effective tax rate was 15.7 percent for the third quarter of 2018 compared with 18.3 percent for the second quarter due to the timing of deductions related to tax planning activities. The federal statutory tax rate was lowered to 21.0 percent effective January 1, 2018. The effective tax rate was 26.8 percent for the third quarter of 2017. CONSOLIDATED balance SHEET REVIEW mediocre total assets were $377.9 billionin the third quarter of 2018 and increased 1 percent compared with $375.6 billionin the second quarter and $373.4 billionin the third quarter of 2017. Higher investment securities and loans were partially offset by lower interest-earning deposits with banks in both comparisons. Total assets were $380.1 billionat September 30, 2018, $380.7 billionat June 30, 2018and $375.2 billionat September 30, 2017. Loans Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In billions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Average Commercial lending $ 149.9 $ 149.7 $ 146.9 - 2 % Consumer lending 73.4 72.9 72.3 1 % 2 % Average loans $ 223.3 $ 222.6 $ 219.2 - 2 % Quarter end Commercial lending $ 149.4 $ 149.6 $ 148.5 - 1 % Consumer lending 73.7 73.3 72.6 1 % 2 % Total loans $ 223.1 $ 222.9 $ 221.1 - 1 % Average loans for the third quarter of 2018 increased $.7 billioncompared with the second quarter. mediocre commercial lending balances grew $.2 billionprimarily in PNC's materiel finance and business credit businesses. Loan growth was moderated by substantial payoff volumes. mediocre consumer lending balances increased $.5 billiondue to growth in auto, residential mortgage, credit card and unsecured installment loans partially offset by lower home equity and education loans. Total loans at September 30, 2018grew $.2 billioncompared with June 30, 2018. Consumer lending balances increased $.4 billionand commercial lending balances decreased $.2 billion. Third quarter 2018 mediocre and era cease loans increased $4.1 billionand $2.0 billion, respectively, compared with third quarter 2017 as a result of higher commercial loans and growth in consumer lending balances. Investment Securities Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In billions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Average $ 80.8 $ 77.5 $ 74.4 4 % 9 % Quarter end $ 80.8 $ 80.1 $ 75.0 1 % 8 % Investment securities mediocre balances for the third quarter of 2018 increased $3.3 billionand era cease balances increased $.7 billioncompared with the second quarter due to net purchase activity, primarily in agency residential mortgage-backed and US Treasury securities. Third quarter 2018 mediocre and era cease investment securities increased $6.4 billionand $5.8 billion, respectively, compared with the third quarter of 2017. Net unrealized losses on available for sale securities were $.7 billionat September 30, 2018, reflecting the impact of higher interest rates, compared with net unrealized losses of $.4 billionat June 30, 2018and net unrealized gains of $.7 billionat September 30, 2017. mediocre balances held with the Federal Reserve Bank decreased to $18.8 billionfor the third quarter of 2018 from $20.7 billionin the second quarter and $23.4 billionin the third quarter of 2017 as investment of liquidity continued. Deposits Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In billions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Average Noninterest-bearing $ 76.2 $ 76.7 $ 79.0 (1) % (4) % Interest-bearing 186.3 184.3 180.5 1 % 3 % Average deposits $ 262.5 $ 261.0 $ 259.5 1 % 1 % Quarter end Noninterest-bearing $ 74.8 $ 79.1 $ 80.0 (5) % (7) % Interest-bearing 190.1 185.8 180.7 2 % 5 % Total deposits $ 264.9 $ 264.9 $ 260.7 - 2 % Average deposits for the third quarter of 2018 increased $1.5 billioncompared with the second quarter as seasonal growth in commercial deposits was partially offset by lower consumer demand deposits attributable in piece to seasonal consumer spending. Deposit growth was in interest-bearing balances, including certificates of deposit, and reflected rising deposit rates. Deposits at September 30, 2018were stable with June 30, 2018and reflected a shift of commercial deposits to interest-bearing from noninterest-bearing. Third quarter 2018 mediocre and era cease deposits increased $3.0 billionand $4.2 billion, respectively, compared with third quarter 2017 driven by overall deposit and customer growth. Borrowed Funds Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In billions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Average $ 59.8 $ 58.9 $ 57.0 2 % 5 % Quarter end $ 58.0 $ 59.3 $ 57.6 (2) % 1 % Average borrowed funds for the third quarter of 2018 increased $.9 billioncompared with the second quarter due to higher repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and subordinated debt partially offset by a diminish in bank notes and senior debt. Borrowed funds at September 30, 2018decreased $1.3 billioncompared with June 30, 2018driven by lower Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings reflecting the maturity of short-term second quarter issuances. Third quarter 2018 mediocre and era cease borrowed funds increased $2.8 billionand $.4 billion, respectively, compared with third quarter 2017. Capital 9/30/2018 * 6/30/2018 9/30/2017 Common shareholders' equity In billions $ 43.1 $ 42.9 $ 42.4 Basel III common equity Tier 1 capital ratio 9.3 % 9.5 % 9.8 % * Ratio estimated PNC maintained a strong capital position. Common shareholders' equity at September 30, 2018increased compared with June 30, 2018due to third quarter net income partially offset by share repurchases, dividends and lower accumulated other comprehensive income reflecting the impact of higher rates on net unrealized securities losses. PNC returned $.9 billionof capital to shareholders in the third quarter of 2018 through repurchases of 3.3 million common shares for $.5 billionand dividends on common shares of $.4 billion. Repurchases were made under share repurchase programs of up to $2.0 billionfor the four-quarter era genesis in the third quarter of 2018. These programs comprise repurchases of up to $.3 billionrelated to stock issuances under employee profit plans. On October 4, 2018, the PNC board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on common stock of 95 centsper share effective with the November 5, 2018dividend payment date. The Basel III common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, which includes the replete phase-in of every Basel III adjustments, became effective for PNC as of January 1, 2018. The ratio for September 30, 2017was calculated on the same basis. These ratios were calculated based on the standardized approach for the risk-weighting of assets. discern Capital Ratios in the Consolidated fiscal Highlights. CREDIT quality REVIEW Credit Quality Change Change At or for the quarter ended 9/30/18 vs 9/30/18 vs In millions 9/30/2018 6/30/2018 9/30/2017 6/30/18 9/30/17 Nonperforming loans $ 1,694 $ 1,719 $ 1,873 (1) % (10) % Nonperforming assets $ 1,825 $ 1,854 $ 2,067 (2) % (12) % Accruing loans past due 90 daysor more $ 619 $ 586 $ 678 6 % (9) % Net charge-offs $ 91 $ 109 $ 106 (17) % (14) % Provision for credit losses $ 88 $ 80 $ 130 10 % (32) % Allowance for loan and lease losses $ 2,584 $ 2,581 $ 2,605 - (1) % Overall credit quality for the third quarter of 2018 remained strong. Provision for credit losses for the third quarter increased $8 millioncompared with the second quarter. The provision for consumer loans increased primarily attributable to credit card and auto loans while the provision for commercial loans was a net profit in the third quarter reflecting lower specific loan reserves. Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2018decreased $29 millioncompared with June 30, 2018due to lower nonperforming commercial loans and residential mortgage loans partially offset by higher nonperforming auto and home equity loans. Nonperforming assets decreased $242 millioncompared with September 30, 2017as a result of lower nonperforming commercial loans, lower other real estate owned and foreclosed and other assets, and lower nonperforming commercial real estate and residential mortgage loans partially offset by higher nonperforming auto and home equity loans. Nonperforming assets to total assets were .48 percent at September 30, 2018, .49 percent at June 30, 2018, and .55 percent at September 30, 2017. Overall delinquencies at September 30, 2018increased $67 million, or 5 percent, compared with June 30, 2018. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more increased $33 millionprimarily in government insured education loans and commercial loans. Accruing loans 30 to 59 days past due increased $32 millionand included higher auto loan delinquencies related to Hurricane Florence. Net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2018 decreased $18 millioncompared with the second quarter with half of the decline attributable to lower home equity loan net charge-offs, and decreased $15 millioncompared with the third quarter of 2017 due to lower commercial loan net charge-offs. Net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2018 were .16 percent of mediocre loans on an annualized basis compared with .20 percent for the second quarter and .19 percent for the third quarter of 2017. The allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans was 1.16 percent at both September 30, 2018and June 30, 2018and 1.18 percent at September 30, 2017. The allowance to nonperforming loans was 153 percent at September 30, 2018, 150 percent at June 30, 2018and 139 percent at September 30, 2017. BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS Business Segment Income In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 Retail Banking $ 283 $ 330 $ 232 Corporate & Institutional Banking 665 675 525 Asset Management Group 61 49 47 Other, including BlackRock 391 302 322 Net income $ 1,400 $ 1,356 $ 1,126 See accompanying notes in Consolidated fiscal Highlights Retail Banking Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Net interest income $ 1,305 $ 1,277 $ 1,176 $ 28 $ 129 Noninterest income $ 622 $ 678 $ 643 $ (56) $ (21) Provision for credit losses $ 113 $ 72 $ 77 $ 41 $ 36 Noninterest expense $ 1,442 $ 1,450 $ 1,375 $ (8) $ 67 Earnings $ 283 $ 330 $ 232 $ (47) $ 51 In billions Average loans $ 74.1 $ 73.7 $ 72.5 $ .4 $ 1.6 Average deposits $ 161.8 $ 162.6 $ 159.5 $ (.8) $ 2.3 Retail Banking earnings for the third quarter of 2018 decreased compared with the second quarter and increased compared with the third quarter of 2017. Earnings benefited from the lower federal statutory income tax rate compared with third quarter 2017. Noninterest income decreased in both comparisons as a result of negative derivative unprejudiced value adjustments related to Visa Class B common shares and a lower profit from residential mortgage servicing rights valuation, net of economic hedge partially offset by higher service charges on deposits. Additionally, consumer service fees grew in the comparison to third quarter 2017, including debit card, brokerage and credit card fees. Provision for credit losses increased in both comparisons due to credit card loan portfolio growth and, in the second quarter comparison, auto loan portfolio growth. Noninterest expense decreased compared with the second quarter reflecting lower occupancy costs and increased in the comparison to third quarter 2017 as a result of higher personnel costs, marketing activity and continued investments in technology.
  • Average loans increased 1 percent compared with the second quarter and 2 percent compared with third quarter 2017 due to growth in auto, residential mortgage, credit card and unsecured installment loans partially offset by lower home equity, commercial and education loans.
  • Average deposits declined compared with the second quarter primarily due to lower demand deposits attributable in piece to seasonal consumer spending. Certificates of deposit increased in the comparison. mediocre deposits grew 1 percent compared with third quarter 2017 as higher demand and savings deposits were partially offset by lower money market deposits reflecting a shift to relationship-based savings products and by a decline in certificates of deposit.
  • Net charge-offs were $96 millionfor the third quarter of 2018 compared with $112 millionin the second quarter and $85 millionin the third quarter of 2017.
  • Residential mortgage loan origination volume was $2.1 billionfor the third quarter of 2018 compared with $2.0 billionfor the second quarter and $2.5 billionfor the third quarter of 2017. Approximately 72 percent of third quarter 2018 volume was for home purchase transactions compared with 71 percent for the second quarter and 57 percent for the third quarter of 2017.
  • The residential mortgage servicing portfolio was $127 billionat September 30, 2018compared with $124 billionat June 30, 2018and $129 billionat September 30, 2017. Residential mortgage loan servicing acquisitions were $6 billionin the third quarter of 2018 compared with $3 billionin the second quarter and $2 billionin the third quarter of 2017.
  • Approximately 66 percent of consumer customers used non-teller channels for the majority of their transactions during the third quarter of 2018 compared with 65 percent in the second quarter and 62 percent in the third quarter of 2017.
  • Deposit transactions via ATM and mobile channels were 55 percent of total deposit transactions in the third quarter of 2018 compared with 54 percent in both the second quarter of 2018 and third quarter of 2017.
  • Corporate & Institutional Banking Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Net interest income $ 925 $ 900 $ 924 $ 25 $ 1 Noninterest income $ 592 $ 635 $ 555 $ (43) $ 37 Provision for credit losses (benefit) $ (13) $ 15 $ 62 $ (28) $ (75) Noninterest expense $ 669 $ 639 $ 599 $ 30 $ 70 Earnings $ 665 $ 675 $ 525 $ (10) $ 140 In billions Average loans $ 137.4 $ 137.0 $ 134.3 $ .4 $ 3.1 Average deposits $ 88.1 $ 85.8 $ 87.5 $ 2.3 $ .6 Corporate & Institutional Banking earnings for the third quarter of 2018 decreased compared with the second quarter of 2018 and increased compared with the third quarter of 2017. Earnings benefited from the lower federal statutory income tax rate compared with third quarter 2017. Noninterest income declined from the second quarter primarily due to lower revenue from commercial mortgage banking activities, including a lower profit from commercial mortgage servicing rights valuation, net of economic hedge, and lower net gains on commercial mortgage loans held for sale. Capital markets-related revenue too declined from the second quarter driven by lower customer-related derivative sales and lower loan syndication fees partially offset by higher merger and acquisition advisory fees. Noninterest income increased compared with the third quarter of 2017 primarily due to higher merger and acquisition advisory fees and growth in treasury management product revenue partially offset by lower gains on asset sales. Provision for credit losses was a profit in the third quarter of 2018 reflecting lower specific loan reserves combined with overall strong portfolio credit quality. Noninterest expense increased in both comparisons due to continued investments in strategic initiatives and variable costs associated with increased business activity.
  • Average loans increased modestly compared with the second quarter primarily in PNC's materiel finance and business credit businesses. Loan growth was moderated by substantial payoff volumes. mediocre loans increased 2 percent compared with the third quarter of 2017 driven by growth in PNC's corporate banking, business credit and materiel finance businesses.
  • Average deposits increased 3 percent over the second quarter reflecting seasonal growth, and increased 1 percent compared with the third quarter of 2017 due to growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a diminish in noninterest-bearing demand deposits.
  • Net charge-offs were $1 millionin the third quarter of 2018 compared with a net recovery position of $2 millionin the second quarter of 2018 and net charge-offs of $22 millionin the third quarter of 2017.
  • Asset Management Group Change Change 3Q18 vs 3Q18 vs In millions 3Q18 2Q18 3Q17 2Q18 3Q17 Net interest income $ 71 $ 72 $ 72 $ (1) $ (1) Noninterest income $ 228 $ 222 $ 220 $ 6 $ 8 Provision for credit losses $ 2 $ 7 $ 3 $ (5) $ (1) Noninterest expense $ 217 $ 223 $ 214 $ (6) $ 3 Earnings $ 61 $ 49 $ 47 $ 12 $ 14 In billions Client assets under administration atquarter end $ 293 $ 279 $ 275 $ 14 $ 18 Average loans $ 7.0 $ 7.0 $ 7.0 - - Average deposits $ 12.3 $ 12.3 $ 12.2 - $ .1 Asset Management Group earnings for the third quarter of 2018 increased in both comparisons. Earnings benefited from the lower federal statutory income tax rate compared with third quarter 2017. Noninterest income increased in both comparisons primarily due to increases in the mediocre equity markets. Provision for credit losses declined from the second quarter reflecting higher second quarter reserves on home equity loans. Noninterest expense decreased compared with the second quarter primarily due to lower legal reserves and increased over third quarter 2017 driven by higher personnel related expenses.
  • Client assets under administration at September 30, 2018include discretionary client assets under management of $159 billionand nondiscretionary client assets under administration of $134 billion.
  • Discretionary client assets under management increased $10 billioncompared with June 30, 2018primarily due to equity market increases and net business activities, and increased $13 billioncompared with September 30, 2017primarily attributable to equity market increases.
  • Other, including BlackRock The 'Other, including BlackRock' category, for the purposes of this release, includes earnings and gains or losses related to PNC's equity investment in BlackRock, and residual activities that finish not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business, such as asset and liability management activities including net securities gains or losses, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and unavoidable trading activities, discontinued consumer loan portfolios, private equity investments, intercompany eliminations, most corporate overhead, tax adjustments that are not allocated to business segments, exited businesses, integration costs, and differences between business segment performance reporting and fiscal statement reporting under generally accepted accounting principles. CONFERENCE summon AND SUPPLEMENTAL fiscal INFORMATION PNC Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer William S. Demchakand Chief fiscal Officer Robert Q. Reillywill hold a conference summon for investors today at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Timeregarding the topics addressed in this intelligence release and the related fiscal supplement. Dial-in numbers for the conference summon are (877) 402-9103 and (312) 281-1206 (international) and Internet access to the live audio listen-only webcast of the summon is available at www.pnc.com/investorevents. PNC's third quarter 2018 earnings release, related fiscal supplement, and presentation slides to chaperone the conference summon remarks will live available at www.pnc.com/investorevents prior to the genesis of the call. A telephone replay of the summon will live available for one week at (800) 633-8284 and (402) 977-9140 (international), conference ID 21894303 and a replay of the audio webcast will live available on PNC's website for 30 days. The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. is one of the largest diversified fiscal services institutions in the United States, organized around its customers and communities for strong relationships and local delivery of retail and business banking including a replete purview of lending products; specialized services for corporations and government entities, including corporate banking, real estate finance and asset-based lending; wealth management and asset management. For information about PNC, visit www.pnc.com. [TABULAR MATERIAL FOLLOWS] View intelligence Release replete Screen The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. Consolidated fiscal Highlights (Unaudited) FINANCIAL RESULTS Three months ended Nine months ended Dollars in millions, except per share data September 30 June 30 September 30 September 30 September 30 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017 Revenue Net interest income $ 2,466 $ 2,413 $ 2,345 $ 7,240 $ 6,763 Noninterest income 1,891 1,911 1,780 5,552 5,306 Total revenue 4,357 4,324 4,125 12,792 12,069 Provision for credit losses 88 80 130 260 316 Noninterest expense 2,608 2,584 2,456 7,719 7,337 Income before income taxes (benefit) and noncontrollinginterests $ 1,661 $ 1,660 $ 1,539 $ 4,813 $ 4,416 Net income $ 1,400 $ 1,356 $ 1,126 $ 3,995 $ 3,297 Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 11 10 12 31 39 Preferred stock dividends (a) 63 55 63 181 181 Preferred stock discount accretion and redemptions 1 1 1 3 24 Net income attributable to common shareholders $ 1,325 $ 1,290 $ 1,050 $ 3,780 $ 3,053 Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated tononvested restricted shares 6 5 5 16 15 Impact of BlackRock earnings per share dilution 2 3 3 7 8 Net income attributable to diluted common shares $ 1,317 $ 1,282 $ 1,042 $ 3,757 $ 3,030 Diluted earnings per common share $ 2.82 $ 2.72 $ 2.16 $ 7.96 $ 6.21 Cash dividends declared per common share $ .95 $ .75 $ .75 $ 2.45 $ 1.85 Effective tax rate (b) 15.7 % 18.3 % 26.8 % 17.0 % 25.3 % (a) Dividends are payable quarterly other than the Series O, Series R and Series S preferred stock, which are payable semiannually, with the Series O payable in different quarters than the Series R and Series S preferred stock. (b) The effective income tax rates are generally lower than the statutory rate due to the relationship of pretax income to tax credits and earnings that are not subject to tax. The 2018 results reflected the change in the statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective as of January 1, 2018, as a result of the novel federal tax legislation. View intelligence Release replete Screen The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. Consolidated fiscal Highlights (Unaudited) Three months ended Nine months ended September 30 June 30 September 30 September 30 September 30 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017 PERFORMANCE RATIOS Net interest margin (a) 2.99 % 2.96 % 2.91 % 2.95 % 2.84 % Noninterest income to total revenue 43 % 44 % 43 % 43 % 44 % Efficiency (b) 60 % 60 % 60 % 60 % 61 % Return on: Average common shareholders' equity (c) 12.32 % 12.13 % 9.89 % 11.83 % 9.76 % Average assets (c) 1.47 % 1.45 % 1.20 % 1.42 % 1.19 % BUSINESS SEGMENT NET INCOME (LOSS) (c) (d) In millions Retail Banking $ 283 $ 330 $ 232 $ 909 $ 675 Corporate & Institutional Banking 665 675 525 1,924 1,527 Asset Management Group 61 49 47 178 146 Other, including BlackRock (e) 391 302 322 984 949 Total net income $ 1,400 $ 1,356 $ 1,126 $ 3,995 $ 3,297 (a) Calculated as annualized taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by mediocre earning assets. To provide more meaningful comparisons of net interest margins, they utilize net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis in calculating net interest margin by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to manufacture it fully equivalent to interest income earned on taxable investments. This adjustment is not permitted under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the Consolidated Income Statement. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017 were $29 million, $29 million and $55 million, respectively. The taxable equivalent adjustments to net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017 were $87 million and $161 million, respectively. Taxable equivalent amounts for the 2018 periods were calculated using a statutory federal income tax rate of 21%, reflecting the enactment of the novel federal tax legislation effective January 1, 2018. Amounts for the 2017 periods were calculated using the previously applicable statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. (b) Calculated as noninterest expense divided by total revenue. (c) The 2018 results reflected the change in the statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective as of January 1, 2018, as a result of the novel federal tax legislation. (d) Our business information is presented based on their internal management reporting practices. Net interest income in business segment results reflect PNC's internal funds transfer pricing methodology. Assets receive a funding pervade and liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on a transfer pricing methodology that incorporates product repricing characteristics, tenor and other factors. (e) Includes earnings and gains or losses related to PNC's equity interest in BlackRock and residual activities that finish not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business. They provide additional information on these activities in their configuration 10-K and configuration 10-Q filings with the SEC. View intelligence Release replete Screen The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. Consolidated fiscal Highlights (Unaudited) September 30 June 30 September 30 2018 2018 2017 BALANCE SHEET DATA Dollars in millions, except per share data Assets $ 380,080 $ 380,711 $ 375,191 Loans (a) $ 223,053 $ 222,855 $ 221,109 Allowance for loan and lease losses $ 2,584 $ 2,581 $ 2,605 Interest-earning deposits with banks $ 19,800 $ 21,972 $ 24,713 Investment securities $ 80,804 $ 80,125 $ 74,994 Loans held for sale (a) $ 1,108 $ 1,325 $ 1,764 Equity investments (b) $ 12,446 $ 12,430 $ 11,009 Mortgage servicing rights $ 2,136 $ 2,045 $ 1,854 Goodwill $ 9,218 $ 9,218 $ 9,163 Other assets (a) $ 28,851 $ 27,897 $ 28,454 Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 74,736 $ 79,047 $ 79,967 Interest-bearing deposits $ 190,148 $ 185,838 $ 180,768 Total deposits $ 264,884 $ 264,885 $ 260,735 Borrowed funds (a) $ 57,955 $ 59,222 $ 57,564 Shareholders' equity $ 47,058 $ 46,904 $ 46,388 Common shareholders' equity $ 43,076 $ 42,917 $ 42,406 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $ (1,260) $ (940) $ (22) Book value per common share $ 93.22 $ 92.26 $ 89.05 Tangible engage value per common share (Non-GAAP) (c) $ 73.11 $ 72.25 $ 69.72 Period cease common shares outstanding (millions) 462 465 476 Loans to deposits 84 % 84 % 85 % CLIENT ASSETS (billions) Discretionary client assets under management $ 159 $ 149 $ 146 Nondiscretionary client assets under administration 134 130 129 Total client assets under administration 293 279 275 Brokerage account client assets 51 49 48 Total client assets $ 344 $ 328 $ 323 CAPITAL RATIOS Basel III (d) (e) (f) Common equity Tier 1 9.3 % 9.5 % N/A Tier 1 risk-based 10.5 % 10.7 % N/A Total capital risk-based 12.7 % 12.6 % N/A Leverage 9.2 % 9.4 % N/A Supplementary leverage 7.6 % 7.8 % N/A Fully Phased-In Basel III (Non-GAAP) Common equity Tier 1 N/A N/A 9.8 % Transitional Basel III (e) Common equity Tier 1 N/A N/A 10.3 % Tier 1 risk-based N/A N/A 11.6 % Total capital risk-based N/A N/A 13.7 % Leverage N/A N/A 9.9 % Common shareholders' equity to total assets 11.3 % 11.3 % 11.3 % ASSET QUALITY Nonperforming loans to total loans .76 % .77 % .85 % Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO, foreclosed and other assets .82 % .83 % .93 % Nonperforming assets to total assets .48 % .49 % .55 % Net charge-offs to mediocre loans (for the three months ended) (annualized) .16 % .20 % .19 % Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans 1.16 % 1.16 % 1.18 % Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans 153 % 150 % 139 % Accruing loans past due 90 days or more (in millions) $ 619 $ 586 $ 678 (a) Amounts comprise assets and liabilities for which they abide elected the unprejudiced value option. Their second quarter 2018 configuration 10-Q included, and their third quarter 2018 configuration 10-Q will include, additional information regarding these Consolidated balance Sheet line items. (b) Amounts comprise their equity interest in BlackRock. Amounts for the 2018 periods reflected $.6 billion of trading and available for sale securities, primarily money market funds, that were reclassified to Equity investments on January 1, 2018 in accordance with the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, fiscal Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of fiscal Assets and fiscal Liabilities. (c) See the Tangible engage Value per Common Share table on page 17 for additional information. (d) The ratios as of September 30, 2018 are estimated. (e) All ratios are calculated using the regulatory capital methodology applicable to PNC during each era presented and calculated based on the standardized approach. discern Capital Ratios on page 16 for additional information. (f) The 2018 Basel III ratios for Common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, Leverage and Supplementary leverage reflect the replete phase-in of every Basel III adjustments to these metrics applicable to PNC. The 2018 Basel III Total risk-based capital ratios comprise $80 million of nonqualifying trust preferred capital securities that are subject to a phase-out era that runs through 2021. View intelligence Release replete Screen The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. Consolidated fiscal Highlights (Unaudited) CAPITAL RATIOS Because PNC remains in the parallel urge qualification phase for the advanced approaches, PNC's regulatory risk-based capital ratios in2018 and 2017 are calculated using the standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets. Under the standardized approach fordetermining credit risk-weighted assets, exposures are generally assigned a pre-defined risk weight. Exposures to tall volatilitycommercial real estate, past due exposures and equity exposures are generally subject to higher risk weights than other types ofexposures. With the exception of unavoidable nonqualifying trust preferred capital securities included in PNC's Total risk-based capital, thetransitions and multi-year phase-in of the definition of capital under the Basel III rules were completed as of January 1, 2018.Accordingly, they mention to the capital ratios calculated using the definition of capital in outcome as of January 1, 2018 and, for the risk-basedratios, standardized risk-weighted assets, as the Basel III ratios. They mention to the capital ratios calculated using the phased-in Basel IIIprovisions in outcome for 2017 and, for the risk-based ratios, standardized approach risk-weighted assets, as the 2017 Transitional Basel IIIratios. We provide information below regarding PNC's estimated Basel III September 30, 2018, actual Basel III June 30, 2018, pro forma FullyPhased-In Basel III September 30, 2017 and actual September 30, 2017 Transitional Basel III Common equity Tier 1 ratios. Under theBasel III rules applicable to PNC, significant common stock investments in unconsolidated fiscal institutions (for PNC, primarilyBlackRock), mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets must live deducted from capital (subject to a phase-in schedule that endedDecember 31, 2017 and net of associated deferred tax liabilities) to the extent they individually exceed 10%, or in the aggregate exceed15%, of the institution's adjusted common equity Tier 1 capital. Also, Basel III regulatory capital includes (subject to a phase-in schedulethat ended December 31, 2017) accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to securities currently and those transferred fromavailable for sale, as well as pension and other postretirement plans. Basel III Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratios Basel III (a) Fully Phased-InBasel III (Non-GAAP) (b) 2017 TransitionalBasel III September 30 June 30 September 30 September 30 Dollars in millions 2018 (estimated) 2018 2017 2017 Common stock, related surplus and retained earnings, net oftreasury stock $ 44,336 $ 43,857 $ 42,426 $ 42,426 Less regulatory capital adjustments: Goodwill and disallowed intangibles, net of deferred taxliabilities (9,299) (9,319) (9,202) (9,137) Basel III total threshold deductions (4,034) (3,408) (1,731) (1,166) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (1,007) (757) (117) (94) All other adjustments (322) (167) (163) (161) Basel III Common equity Tier 1 capital $ 29,674 $ 30,206 $ 31,213 $ 31,868 Basel III standardized approach risk-weighted assets (c) $ 318,321 $ 319,112 $ 317,393 $ 309,292 Basel III advanced approaches risk-weighted assets (d) $ 274,072 $ 280,883 $ 285,517 N/A Basel III Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio 9.3 % 9.5 % 9.8 % 10.3 % Risk weight and associated rules utilized Standardized Standardized Standardized(with 2017transitionadjustments) (a) 2018 results are calculated using the regulatory capital methodology applicable to us during 2018 and reflects the replete phase-in of every Basel III adjustments to this metric applicable to PNC. (b) 2017 Fully Phased-In Basel III results are presented as pro forma estimates. (c) Basel III standardized approach risk-weighted assets are based on the Basel III standardized approach rules and comprise credit and market risk-weighted assets. (d) Basel III advanced approaches risk-weighted assets are based on the Basel III advanced approaches rules, and comprise credit, market and operational risk-weighted assets. During the parallel urge qualification phase, PNC has refined the data, models and internal processes used as piece of the advanced approaches for determining risk-weighted assets. They anticipate additional refinements through the parallel urge qualification phase. Our Basel III capital ratios may live impacted by additional regulatory guidance or analysis, and, in the case of those ratios calculated using the advanced approaches, may live subject to variability based on the ongoing evolution, validation and regulatory approval of PNC's models that are integral to the calculation of advanced approaches risk-weighted assets as PNC moves through the parallel urge approval process. View intelligence Release replete Screen The PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc. Consolidated fiscal Highlights (Unaudited) Tangible engage value per common share is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated based on tangible common shareholders' equitydivided by period-end common shares outstanding. They believe this non-GAAP measure serves as a useful tool to abet evaluate thestrength and discipline of a company's capital management strategies and as an additional, conservative measure of total company value. Tangible engage Value per Common Share (Non-GAAP) September 30 June 30 September 30 Dollars in millions, except per share data 2018 2018 2017 Book value per common share $ 93.22 $ 92.26 $ 89.05 Tangible engage value per common share Common shareholders' equity $ 43,076 $ 42,917 $ 42,406 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (9,489) (9,511) (9,503) Deferred tax liabilities on Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 192 192 301 Tangible common shareholders' equity $ 33,779 $ 33,598 $ 33,204 Period-end common shares outstanding (millions) 462 465 476 Tangible engage value per common share (Non-GAAP) $ 73.11 $ 72.25 $ 69.72 Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information They manufacture statements in this intelligence release and related conference call, and they may from time to time manufacture other statements, regarding their outlook for earnings, revenues, expenses, tax rates, capital and liquidity levels and ratios, asset levels, asset quality, fiscal position, and other matters regarding or affecting PNC and its future business and operations that are forward-looking statements within the significance of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as 'believe,' 'plan,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'see,' 'look,' 'intend,' 'outlook,' 'project,' 'forecast,' 'estimate,' 'goal,' 'will,' 'should' and other similar words and expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. They finish not assume any duty and finish not undertake to update forward-looking statements. Actual results or future events could differ, possibly materially, from those anticipated in forward-looking statements, as well as from historical performance. Their forward-looking statements are subject to the following principal risks and uncertainties.
  • Our businesses, fiscal results and balance sheet values are affected by business and economic conditions, including the following:
  • Changes in interest rates and valuations in debt, equity and other fiscal markets.
  • Disruptions in the U.S. and global fiscal markets.
  • Actions by the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Treasury and other government agencies, including those that impact money supply and market interest rates.
  • Changes in customer deportment due to recently enacted tax legislation, changing business and economic conditions or legislative or regulatory initiatives.
  • Changes in customers', suppliers' and other counterparties' performance and creditworthiness.
  • Slowing or reversal of the current U.S. economic expansion.
  • Commodity cost volatility.
  • Our forward-looking fiscal statements are subject to the risk that economic and fiscal market conditions will live substantially different than those they are currently expecting and finish not purchase into account potential legal and regulatory contingencies. These statements are based on their view that U.S. economic growth has accelerated over the past two years and will remain above its long-run trend for the balance of 2018 and into 2019, in light of stimulus from corporate and personal income tax cuts passed in late 2017 that are expected to support business investment and consumer spending, respectively. They hope an enlarge in federal government spending will too support economic growth for the balance of 2018 and into 2019. Further gradual improvement in the labor market this year and next, including job gains and rising wages, is another positive for consumer spending. Trade restrictions are a growing downside risk to the forecast. Inflation has accelerated to nearby to the Federal Open Market Committee's 2 percent objective. Short-term interest rates and bond yields are expected to tower throughout the balance of 2018 and into 2019; after the Federal Open Market Committee raised the federal funds rate in September, their baseline forecast is for one additional rate hike in December 2018, pushing the rate to a purview of 2.25 to 2.50 percent by the cease of the year. PNC expects two 25 basis point increases in the fed funds rate in 2019 (in June and September); this would purchase the fed funds rate to a purview of 2.75 to 3.00 percent by the cease of next year.
  • PNC's ability to purchase unavoidable capital actions, including returning capital to shareholders, is subject to review by the Federal Reserve Board as piece of PNC's comprehensive capital plot for the applicable era in connection with the Federal Reserve Board's Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process and to the acceptance of such capital plot and non-objection to such capital actions by the Federal Reserve Board.
  • PNC's regulatory capital ratios in the future will depend on, among other things, the company's fiscal performance, the scope and terms of final capital regulations then in outcome (particularly those implementing the international regulatory capital framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee)), and management actions affecting the composition of PNC's balance sheet. In addition, PNC's ability to determine, evaluate and forecast regulatory capital ratios, and to purchase actions (such as capital distributions) based on actual or forecasted capital ratios, will live conditional at least in piece on the development, validation and regulatory approval of related models.
  • Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information (Continued)
  • Legal and regulatory developments could abide an impact on their ability to operate their businesses, fiscal condition, results of operations, competitive position, reputation, or pursuit of attractive acquisition opportunities. Reputational impacts could move matters such as business generation and retention, liquidity, funding, and ability to attract and retain management. These developments could include:
  • Changes resulting from legislative and regulatory reforms, including changes affecting oversight of the fiscal services industry, consumer protection, pension, bankruptcy and other industry aspects, and changes in accounting policies and principles.
  • Changes to regulations governing bank capital and liquidity standards.
  • Unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or other claims and regulatory and other governmental investigations or other inquiries. These matters may result in monetary judgments or settlements or other remedies, including fines, penalties, restitution or alterations in their business practices, and in additional expenses and collateral costs, and may understanding reputational harm to PNC.
  • Results of the regulatory examination and supervision process, including their failure to meet requirements of agreements with governmental agencies.
  • Impact on business and operating results of any costs associated with obtaining rights in intellectual property claimed by others and of adequacy of their intellectual property protection in general.
  • Business and operating results are affected by their ability to identify and effectively manage risks inherent in their businesses, including, where appropriate, through effective utilize of systems and controls, third-party insurance, derivatives, and capital management techniques, and to meet evolving regulatory capital and liquidity standards.
  • Business and operating results too comprise impacts relating to their equity interest in BlackRock, Inc. and rely to a significant extent on information provided to us by BlackRock. Risks and uncertainties that could move BlackRock are discussed in more detail by BlackRock in its SEC filings.
  • We grow their business in piece through acquisitions. Acquisition risks and uncertainties comprise those presented by the nature of the business acquired, including in some cases those associated with their entry into novel businesses or novel geographic or other markets and risks resulting from their inexperience in those novel areas, as well as risks and uncertainties related to the acquisition transactions themselves, regulatory issues, and the integration of the acquired businesses into PNC after closing.
  • Competition can abide an impact on customer acquisition, growth and retention and on credit spreads and product pricing, which can move market share, deposits and revenues. Their ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes can too impact their ability to respond to customer needs and meet competitive demands.
  • Business and operating results can too live affected by widespread natural and other disasters, pandemics, dislocations, terrorist activities, system failures, security breaches, cyberattacks or international hostilities through impacts on the economy and fiscal markets generally or on us or their counterparties specifically.
  • We provide greater detail regarding these as well as other factors in their 2017 configuration 10-K and their 2018 configuration 10-Qs, including in the Risk Factors and Risk Management sections and the Legal Proceedings and Commitments Notes of the Notes To Consolidated fiscal Statements in those reports, and in their subsequent SEC filings. Their forward-looking statements may too live subject to other risks and uncertainties, including those they may dispute elsewhere in this intelligence release or in their SEC filings, accessible on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and on their corporate website at www.pnc.com/secfilings. They abide included these web addresses as dormant textual references only. Information on these websites is not piece of this document. MEDIA: PNC Media Relations(412) 762-4550media.relations@pnc.com INVESTORS: Bryan Gill(412) 768-4143investor.relations@pnc.com SOURCE PNC fiscal Services Group, Inc.


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [47 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [746 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1530 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [368 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [269 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11747914
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1pZ
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12306884
    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/050-854
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/free-pass4sure-050-854-question-bank.html
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/u9ha0qzuxdduclul419fbtzzouvytxr0
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/62c50259949a44d82422b97e91c70ea9c4b24






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://www.radionaves.com/